From: "Christian Langanke" Received: from mxout4.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.168] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 427362 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:33:13 -0400 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GY7Es-000GJw-EC for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:33:11 -0400 Received: from waldorf.webpack.hosteurope.de ([217.115.142.71]) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GY7Es-000JCP-9C for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:33:10 -0400 Received: by waldorf.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.51 using esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) from p5084a5c0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.132.165.192] helo=[172.32.16.110]) id 1GY7El-0005do-KM; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:33:04 +0200 Message-ID: <452EA689.90507@clanganke.de> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:33:13 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (OS/2/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: OT(?): ThinkVantage? Access Connections References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Hi Carl, Carl Gehr wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:42:41 +0200 (CEST), Christian Langanke wrote: > > > Certainly, I understand all your comments... > > 1) I was really using the word 'port' in a VERY generic way; > really only thinking of porting 'function' and/or 'ideas' > not 'code'. > Understood. I think this will not be doable though - what GenMac does is only a small subset of things a soutlion for an end user app would need to do - like Odin does. > 2) I think I was actually a little bit successful in my attempt > to get some ideas on the table for others who are capable of > *doing* this kind of thing. [I am absolutely *not* such an > individual.] If the original posting triggered a 'maybe I > could do that...,' it was worth my time to do so. > Definitely yes, I think I made that clear. > And, just for the record, I would personally be willing to pay real > money for many functions like this. The most reasonable thing to do something in this direction is: somebody ask Innotek if they would do an Odin integration (like for the adobe reader and Win32 Java etc.) for money, because they support odin integration of apps. I expect though that such a solution could not be sold often enough so that they would want to do it. > I DO appreciate the work that you > and so many others do to make eCS usable for those of us who are not > competent to do it for ourselves. I appreciate the fact that a lot of > these tools are 'free' to us 'sponges.' I know it is not 'free' to you > who produce them. So... > THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ALL YOUR EFFORTS! > Thanx a lot ! bye, Christian ------------------------------------------------- Christian Langanke COS2E & CWSE Team OS/2 Ruhr e.V. cla@clanganke.de