From: "Ed Durrant" Received: from mxout2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.166] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 434212 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:59:47 -0400 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GZMRl-0002qO-N3 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:59:46 -0400 Received: from omta02sl.mx.bigpond.com ([144.140.93.154]) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GZMRl-000JIP-Cy for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:59:37 -0400 Received: from [192.168.30.2] (really [147.10.172.143]) by omta02sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20061016065929.RMFR14640.omta02sl.mx.bigpond.com@[192.168.30.2]> for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:59:29 +0000 Message-ID: <45332DCA.9010108@bigpond.net.au> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:59:22 +1000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (OS/2/20060727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: 1802 patch. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at omta02sl.mx.bigpond.com from [147.10.172.143] using ID edurrant@bigpond.net.au at Mon, 16 Oct 2006 06:59:29 +0000 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Kris Steenhaut wrote: > Ed Durrant ha scritto: >>> >>> http://www.taartenbakkerij.eu/bestanden/no_1802.zip >>> >>> >>> >> >> The file you have IS different - it's a COM program > That is what it should be. > >> while what I downloaded is a much larger EXE program > Then I rather would like to put it under suspiscion. >> if you want to put it on your website as an alternative to the one you >> have. >> > No, as I'm sure mine is the good one. Actually, I had one the source > code, and it is just about 8 or 10 lines IIRC. So, there is no good > reason why it should have been compiled to a much larger *exe file. > > > I agree the amount of code being changed in the BIOS is so small, so why such a big EXE ? Heck I don't care it fixes the BIOS as I wanted so that's that. It sounds like the much smaller COM file you have has also worked for you - so that's fine as well. QED: both probably work - but both require NO MINI-PCI card to be installed when the patch is made, which may be why it didn't work for whoever it was posted her (sorry - the name got truncated out a few replies ago) ! Cheers/2 Ed.