From: "Neil Waldhauer" Received: from mxout1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.165] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 438575 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:59:14 -0400 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GZrKu-000L6P-Vo for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:59:09 -0400 Received: from mail.cruzio.com ([63.249.95.37]) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GZrKu-0009VE-OE for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:58:36 -0400 Received: from 192.168.46.68 (dsl3-63-249-86-58.cruzio.com [63.249.86.58]) by mail.cruzio.com with SMTP id k9HFwZ9O095152 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200610171558.k9HFwZ9O095152@mail.cruzio.com> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:57:05 -0700 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Another weird motel situation MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25d; build=2006 X-Mailer-Platform: OS/2; architecture=x86; version=20.45 X-Mailer-Java-VM: IBM Corporation; version=J2RE 1.3.1 IBM build co131-20060605 (SR10) (JIT enabled: jitc); compiler=jitc X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:47:19 -0400 (EDT), "Carl Gehr" wrote: > PMMail already has the abiltiy to specify a port. > [I'm using PMMail 2.20.2382 for OS/2 Warp 4.5] > > So, what should I ask for? A mini-SMTP server to be built into PMMail? Oh. I've got PMMail 2.90.0.0082, and I see that it does. You did try to send mail, and failed. My ISP also offers port 587 for sending. Many wireless providers don't block port 587. A mini SMTP server might be blocked just the same. Neil -- Neil Waldhauer, neil@blondeguy.com Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence. - Napoleon Bonaparte