From: "Julian Thomas" Received: from mxout4.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.168] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 439299 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:49:09 -0400 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GZuv8-000A8P-2X for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:48:53 -0400 Received: from smtp.fltg.net ([208.20.35.3] helo=emerald.fltg.net) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GZuv7-000EPq-OZ for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:48:13 -0400 Received: from ASUS (fltg-dslttc1-30.fltg.net [208.31.47.161]) by emerald.fltg.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id k9HKE2A31586 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:14:02 -0400 Message-Id: <200610172014.k9HKE2A31586@emerald.fltg.net> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:46:47 -0400 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Another weird motel situation X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v2.67/60 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS In , on 10/17/06 at 01:29 PM, "Carl Gehr" typed: >I've tried to send, but never tried a different port. Knowing zero about >ports, is 587 supposed to be a standard alternative? Or, does each ISP >offer their own to try to make it more difficult to use by 'unwanted' >users? As Neil pointed out, telnet was also blocked. I tried port 2525 because that is what the hosting service (not an ISP) that hosts my mail and website suggested as an alternate. -- Julian Thomas: jt@jt-mj.net http://jt-mj.net In the beautiful Finger Lakes Wine Country of New York State! Warpstock X - October 12-15 2006; I was there - why weren't you? -- -- The truth is out there? Does anyone know the URL?