From: "Jeffrey Race" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from mxout4.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.168] verified)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with ESMTP id 439409 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:07:31 -0400
Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176])
	by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1GZvDE-000M1t-KZ
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:07:15 -0400
Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.102])
	by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1GZvDE-000KQT-FL
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:06:56 -0400
Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28])
  by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2006 16:06:56 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,321,1157342400"; 
   d="scan'208"; a="324450369:sNHT25209276"
Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11])
	by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA)
	with ESMTP id HHU48099;
	Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:06:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 209-6-22-103.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO 600X2A) ([209.6.22.103])
  by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2006 16:06:34 -0400
Message-Id: <5c1si1$8pe6j2@smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net>
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,321,1157342400"; 
   d="scan'208"; a="295115362:sNHT26624088"
To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:06:34 -0400
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Standard (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.0.2195;4)
In-Reply-To: <list-439241@2rosenthals.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Another weird motel situation
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net
X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown,
	refid=str=0001.0A090201.45353779.003B,ss=1,fgs=0,
	ip=207.172.4.11,
	so=2006-05-09 23:27:51,
	dmn=5.2.113/2006-07-26
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:35:22 -0400 (EDT), Carl Gehr wrote:

>I do use PMMail.  But, the level I'm using has the option to specify a
>Port.  Are you saying that the Port 25 that I have specified is
>automatically overridden if I check the 'requires authorization' box? 
>The Help text does not indicate this is done.

i am using 2.20.2717.  I can find no configuration option.  But so
far as I know auth always goes to port 587.  

i am running the windows version now until i can get my ecs partition
up again.    there may be some difference

jr