From: "Al Heath" Received: from mxout4.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.168] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 492421 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:58:04 -0500 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GexrA-000ETf-5q for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:58:01 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Gexr8-0000Kh-9t for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:56:59 -0500 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k9VHufVx012616 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:56:41 -0500 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id k9VHuftB246652 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:56:41 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k9VHufm4031555 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:56:41 -0700 Received: from d03nm122.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm122.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.148]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k9VHudxO031460 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:56:40 -0700 Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Getting started with GenMac To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:56:36 -0600 Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM122/03/M/IBM(Release 7.0.1HF269 | June 22, 2006) at 10/31/2006 10:56:40 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=09BBF88BDFF224F08f9e8a93df938690918c09BBF88BDFF224F0" Content-Disposition: inline X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS --0__=09BBF88BDFF224F08f9e8a93df938690918c09BBF88BDFF224F0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Ah okay. the ADDENDUM 2 was a little vague. It isn't that "... based= Thinkpad laptop, or one that has the Intel Speedstep technology.." but rather the specific 8086:4220 device and not necessarily in general with Thinkpads that hav= e Intel Speedstep technology. That is, you can have "one that has the In= tel Speedstep technology" and still not have any problems at all. And actually, I don't like riddles, that was why I asked. But being so= admonished now I'll go back to being a lurker. Al H Kris Steenhaut originally replied: >As apparently you do like riddles I'll answer in the same mysterious w= ay: > >We were and are discussing the problems with a 8086:4220. And it has >turned out the 8086:4220 has severe problems with the so called >"Speedstep technology" (and hence with IBM Thinpad T4* and, R4*). Mayb= e >not so much the device itself but it's device driver. >So, your 168C:1014 isn't at stake at all. >Suggest you di have a better reading. >>to Al Heath ha scritto: >> >> >> To be honest, I don't follow this exactly as I've been lightly >> scanning this thread. I have a T42 with built in wireless. >> (168C:1014) and have SpeedStep Enabled in bios and I DON'T have a >> problem connecting (etc) running on battery or AC. My power mode fo= r >> Battery is [Maximum Battery Life] and customize [Fixed Max] [5 >> minutes] [5 minutes] [3 minutes] for those fields. Mode for AC >> [Automatic] and mode for battery [battery optimized]. Many other >> fields are enabled too.... Is the problem only with certain wireles= s >> cards (such as the Toshiba branded Mini_PCI card) or supposedly in >> general?= --0__=09BBF88BDFF224F08f9e8a93df938690918c09BBF88BDFF224F0 Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Ah okay. the ADDENDUM 2 was a little vague. It isn't that ".= .. based Thinkpad laptop, or one
that has the Intel Speedstep technology.." but rather the spe= cific 8086:4220 device and not necessarily in general with Thi= nkpads that have Intel Speedstep technology. That is, you can have &qu= ot;one that has the Intel Speedstep technology" and still not have= any problems at all.

And actually, I don't like riddles, that was why I asked. But being so= admonished now I'll go back to being a lurker.

Al H

Kris Steenhaut originally replied:
>As apparently you do like riddles I'll answer in the same myste= rious way:
>
>We were and are discussing the problems with a 8086:4220. And i= t has
>turned out the 8086:4220 has severe problems with the so called
= >"Speedstep technology" (and hence with IBM Thinpad T4* an= d, R4*). Maybe
>not so much the device itself but it's device driver.

>So, your 168C:1014 isn't at stake at all.

>Suggest you di have a better reading.
>>to Al Heath ha scritto:
>>
>>
>> To be honest, I don't follow this exactly as I've been lightly=
>> scanning this thread.  I have a T42 with built in wireles= s.
>> (168C:1014) and have SpeedStep Enabled in bios and I DON'T hav= e a
>> problem connecting (etc) running on battery or AC.  My po= wer mode for
>> Battery is [Maximum Battery Life] and customize [Fixed Max] [5=
>> minutes] [5 minutes] [3 minutes] for those fields.  Mode = for AC
>> [Automatic] and mode for battery [battery optimized].  Ma= ny other
>> fields are enabled too....  Is the problem only with cert= ain wireless
>> cards (such as the Toshiba branded Mini_PCI card) or supposedl= y in
>> general?
= --0__=09BBF88BDFF224F08f9e8a93df938690918c09BBF88BDFF224F0--