From: "Ed Durrant" Received: from mxout3.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.167] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 492841 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:23:07 -0500 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Gf089-000O3F-8q for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:23:03 -0500 Received: from omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com ([144.140.93.156]) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Gf083-0009Ld-To for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:22:36 -0500 Received: from [192.168.30.2] (really [124.189.184.88]) by omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20061031202228.JCTQ11279.omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com@[192.168.30.2]> for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:22:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4547B07B.2010404@bigpond.net.au> Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 07:22:19 +1100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0a1 (OS/2/20060803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Getting started with GenMac References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at omta04sl.mx.bigpond.com from [124.189.184.88] using ID edurrant@bigpond.net.au at Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:22:28 +0000 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Stanley Sidlov wrote: > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:01:08 -0500, madodel wrote: > >> There are at least three of us with T4x's and Intel 2200bg cards that >> experienced the problem. Disabling the Speedstep in the BIOS was the only >> thing that allowed the 2200 to be seen by xwlan. Others had it working but >> only on AC, and not on battery. It makes no sense since it worked for me >> for several months without changing anything and always worked fine with an >> Intel 2100b card, but this is what we discovered to fix the problem. > > just a comment. is it possible that the problem is a result of the ACPI updates? Especially if it worked for a while.... > (I have no way to test this hypothesis as I have a pcmcia card and no access to the Mensys Beta - though I think I should, but haven't been enabled by mensys) > > > Thanks for the input Stan - I wondered the same and tried having ACPI on and OFF on my T30 when I installed there under eCS 2.0B2M2 - it didn't make any difference - the key point was the BIOS settings, in my case. Just an additional comment - the T42 ran eCS 1.2R and the T30 eCS 2.0B2M2 so I think they were using different versions of ACPI. Cheers/2 Ed.