From: "Andy Willis" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=oYNiIB33hsrkypm8pYn/+HHg1k3xu6ZRM+IA6qj8YnbhTWuq0JVYGOIqjrxRokRSSxUTxiri/m7thQMkLQ1dBd2tY2urHvQEuKXHTsBFvi7VV7euVBu1zE1IelyGJ6tWQaMx8TFGXfXHw19sh4XOWIeggA1s1TgoUuzXyar2/ss=
Message-ID: <454A0D26.8040908@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:22:14 -0700
Reply-To:  abwillis1@gmail.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20061101 SeaMonkey/1.5a
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: [Fwd: Invitation to Present at WS2006]
References: <list-496784@2rosenthals.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-496784@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:
> On 11/01/06 05:10 pm, Andy Willis thus wrote :
>> madodel wrote:
>>> Andy Willis wrote:
>>>> Andy Willis wrote:
>>>>> madodel wrote:
>>>>>> Andy Willis wrote:
>>>>>>> Hmm, I seem to have the same problem as Mark.  I didn't notice 
>>>>>>> when I typed L that it showed Lewis' name but the address was the 
>>>>>>> list.
>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think its that this list sets the From: as the list address but 
>>>>>> with the actual senders name.  That confuses  TB. when you then 
>>>>>> try to recall an existing address.  This is the only list I have 
>>>>>> seen do this.  It means  we have to be more careful with picking  
>>>>>> To: addresses suggested by TB.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark
>>>>> It is related to the collected addresses.  Anyone that you send to 
>>>>> it adds the address.  But looking at the address I am just 
>>>>> surprised it found Lewis's name unless the headers changed after it 
>>>>> got collected.
>>>>> I removed it and readded it directly and it did not put Lewis's 
>>>>> name in there so now I removed it again and will see what gets 
>>>>> added this time for the collected address.
>>>>> Andy
>>>> It added it as expected now, Lewis' name is not in the field.
>>>> Andy
>>>
>>> But now if you send me an email, my guess is it will display the one 
>>> with this lists address attached to my name  (well not my name, but 
>>> my sender name "madodel").
>>>
>>> Mark
>> No, I think what happened was that prior to Lewis making some changes 
>> to the list here while back it had his name on the list (or maybe the 
>> initial changes caused that as I used to not have that issue).  I 
>> checked your name and I have it twice, Mark Dodel and madodel both 
>> show up but not associated to any list (ptd and ptdprolog).
>> Anyway, I think this was specific to the way the headers were set up 
>> at one point on this list and unless another list does a similar setup 
>> it won't be an issue.  Checking in fact I have only 2 addresses that 
>> contain os2-wireless, this list and an os2-wireless.de address for 
>> Jens Glathe.  So my guess is during the changes Lewis had something 
>> set long enough for us to respond to that had his name in the header 
>> somehow that has since been removed, otherwise I would expect to see 
>> other people that I responded to on the list listed with their name 
>> and os2-wireless (that or it was only the first person that is 
>> responded to on the list so if someone first responed to you -when the 
>> list left the names for instance- it would have your name instead of 
>> Lewis's... in such a case everyone here might want to check their 
>> Mozilla address book to make sure that os2-wireless doesn't show up 
>> twice).
>> Andy
>>
> Yes, I think the issue must have cropped up before I moved the list to 
> CGP in March. I have tried now with a few names on the list, and 
> nobody's name comes up in SeaMonkey associated with the list address. 
> However, there are differences (as we all know) between SM's MailNews 
> client and TB, and I have *not* tested with TB. So, if we could get some 
> more input form others on the list, it would be greatly appreciated.
> 
Well, I use Seamonkey and Mark was using TB so I don't think the 
difference is there in this case.
Andy