From: "Carl Gehr" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from mxout1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.165] verified)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with ESMTP id 521734 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:51:14 -0500
Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175])
	by mxout1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1Gj8FJ-000C0b-B5
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:51:13 -0500
Received: from mail-out1.fuse.net ([216.68.8.174] helo=smtp1.fuse.net)
	by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1Gj8FI-000DTm-Tq
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:51:09 -0500
Received: from gx5.fuse.net ([208.102.7.45]) by smtp1.fuse.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP
          id <20061112055103.ZNIS1025.smtp1.fuse.net@gx5.fuse.net>
          for <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>;
          Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:51:03 -0500
Received: from localhost ([208.102.7.45]) by gx5.fuse.net
          (InterMail vG.1.02.00.02 201-2136-104-102-20041210) with ESMTP
          id <20061112055103.SVGI6736.gx5.fuse.net@localhost>
          for <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>;
          Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:51:03 -0500
To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:51:00 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: "Carl Gehr" <Carl.Gehr@attglobal.net>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2382 for OS/2 Warp 4.5
In-Reply-To: <list-521550@2rosenthals.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: OT Still:  Fingerprint Reader [Was JFS file recovery]
Message-Id: <20061112055103.SVGI6736.gx5.fuse.net@localhost>
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 03:33:10 +0100, Kris Steenhaut wrote:

>Carl Gehr ha scritto:
>> Rick,
>>
>> Are you implying by your comment below that you have been able to USE
>> the fingerprint reader on your T32p...?
>>
>> I have one on my just received T60, but never expected bo be able to
>> use it.
>>
>>   
>USB devices at the TP42 still were USB1.1 compatible. That changed for the worst with from the TP43 series on.  Me thinks that explains the differences in behaviour.

Sorry, Kris, but I have no idea what your response means relative to
the question I asked.

You omitted Rick's comment:
>>Rick R. ha scritto:
>
>  <Snip>
>>>  
>>> I never had any issues with the fingerprint reader on my T42p.

And, in my question, I don't believe I said anything at all about
"USB".  I asked specifically about "fingerprint reader" and if it does
or does not work.  I felt that Rick's comment implied that he has it
working.

Carl