From: "Carl Gehr" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:27:52 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: "Carl Gehr" <Carl.Gehr@attglobal.net>
Priority: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-522756@2rosenthals.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: OT Still:  Fingerprint Reader [Was JFS file recovery]
Message-Id: <20061112232755.VBPP6736.gx5.fuse.net@localhost>

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:21:11 +0100, Kris Steenhaut wrote:

>I gave definitely an answer to the question you asked ...

Your previous response said:
>USB devices at the TP42 still were USB1.1 compatible. That changed
>for the worst with from the TP43 series on.  Me thinks that explains
>the differences in behaviour.
>

Kris, with all due respect:

Since I asked about FINGERPRINT READER and had NO IDEA that the
Fingerprint Reader is a USB device, I had no clue to connect your 'USB'
comments to 'fingerprint' support...

Now, having cleared up that point, I STILL have the original question:

	Assuming that my system DOES support the USB
	controllers [1.1 or 2.0]:

	IS THERE SUPPORT for the FINGERPRINT reader?

If there is no support for a fingerprint reader, it really does not
matter if the USB is supported or not, does it?

Carl