From: "Kris Steenhaut" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Message-ID: <4557BA72.6060301@kolibrieweg.eu>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 01:21:06 +0100
Organization: CFM$-FC (Coalition for Micro$oft-Free Computing)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; it-IT; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060912 SeaMonkey/1.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: OT Still:  Fingerprint Reader [Was JFS file
 recovery]
References: <list-523140@2rosenthals.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-523140@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Carl Gehr ha scritto:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:21:11 +0100, Kris Steenhaut wrote:
>
>   
>> I gave definitely an answer to the question you asked ...
>>     
>
> Your previous response said:
>   
>> USB devices at the TP42 still were USB1.1 compatible. That changed
>> for the worst with from the TP43 series on.  Me thinks that explains
>> the differences in behaviour.
>>
>>     
>
> Kris, with all due respect:
>
> Since I asked about FINGERPRINT READER and had NO IDEA that the
> Fingerprint Reader is a USB device,
That is to say the least very surprising, as I'm always assuming tech 
people do know what they are talking about.
>  I had no clue to connect your 'USB'
> comments to 'fingerprint' support...
>
> Now, having cleared up that point, I STILL have the original question:
>
> 	Assuming that my system DOES support the USB
> 	controllers [1.1 or 2.0]:
>
> 	IS THERE SUPPORT for the FINGERPRINT reader?
>   
I have repeated now enoumerous times usbehcd.sys doesn't support the 
fingerprint thing. So, unless the adapter the device is connected to is 
usb1.1 compatible, the answer is no.

And as other and I have learnt the hard way, from the TP43 series on 
this kind of gadget might jeopardize an eCS install.

-- 
Groeten uit Gent,

   Kris