Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: GenMAC 1.6 resp 1.7 / was Getting worse performance with new GenMAC 2.0
Date:
Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:55:18 +0100
To:
os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
Hi OS2-WL-Users,
Very important hint, according to Marc Dodel & CLA:
There is NO GenMAC 1.6 resp. 1.7 !!!
GenMAC is only public as V 1.00 and, currently now, V 2.00 !!
Please stop the discussion with these irregular versions and
concentrate on the supported ones & do read the NETlabs webpages !
TIA, best regards & success, I also need it to overcome my WL problems
;-)
svobi
os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com on 19.11.2006 04:17:48
Please respond to os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
cc:
Subject: [OS2Wireless]Re: Getting worse performance with new GenMAC 2.0
Hi Isaac,
You know you have to unlock the files before you can load different
versions "over" the files don't you ? Otherwise you could end up with
the v 1.6 helper exe and version 2.0 of the driver (the helper exe
didn't change between v 1.6 and 1.7 I think).
Cheers/2
Ed.
Isaac Leung wrote:
> Well, I'm not so concerned about the actual numbers. But they do seem
> to correlate with perceived performance. Even when I do have
> connection, it seems noticeably slower than with 1.6 no matter where
> or when I'm surfing the web.
>
> I could kind of live with that, but not with it crapping out or
> failing to acquire.
>
> This particular laptop just had a fresh (2 weeks old!) install on
> which I put on a clean GenMAC 1.6 install. I then installed right over
> with 2.0 a few days ago and saw the same problems as I did with 1.7 on
> a previous installation. I installed right over again with 1.6 and it
> is very happy now.....mysterious....
>
>
> Isaac
>
> On 11/18/06, Andy Willis <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> wrote:
>> Isaac Leung wrote:
>> > Is anyone else seeing the same issue?
>> >
>> > I have a Thinkpad T40p with the built-in wireless (It is Atheros
>> chipset).
>> > Using GenMAC 1.6 with XWLAN 2.14, it has been pretty much flawless.
>> > (Warp 4.52 with FP5)
>> >
>> > I tried GenMAC 1.7 a while ago, it was worse so I switched back. I
>> > recently upgraded to GenMAC 2.0 with XWLAN 3.0 and it shows the
same
>> > behaviour. MUCH worse!
>> >
>> >
>> > Here's the symptoms:
>> > - The reception shows typically 5-10% weaker signal, for whatever
>> > reason. (I'm in a small apartment, so it's easy to be repeatable
to be
>> > in the same physical location).
>> > - It takes MUCH longer to acquire IP address, sometimes it fails to
>> > ever acquire unless I ask to "scan for connection" again.
>> > - Connection fails after some time. i.e. I can surf and connect to
all
>> > the web sites for about the first 10-15min. or whatever, but then
it
>> > "dies". XWLAN shows green and connected, but I cannot even ping my
own
>> > router or any other web site.
>> >
>> >
>> > Any tips or suggestions?
>> > I've reverted back to 1.6 for now since the newer editions are
>> > essentially unuseable for me.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Isaac
>> I had no problems connecting to either of my AP's (home and work)
with
>> any 1.x. It did seem to take quite a while to acquire an IP but I
>> couldn't say it was out of the norm as it has been so long since I
>> connected windows via wireless I don't recall how long it took. 2.0
>> seems to take about as long via a WEP connection but WPA seems to get
>> an IP much faster (there are some variables I need check before I can
>> say that definitively).
>> I have noticed that with genmac 2.0 (whether with wlan 2.14 or 3.0)
it
>> does show to have a weaker signal. What I have not determined as yet
>> is whether the signal is actually weaker or if the guage is more
>> sensitive/accurate. I have also seen stronger signal than I have
ever
>> gotten as well - such as right now I am seeing 100% which the
>> strongest I had ever seen from this AP is 88% and my T42 is/has been
>> literally 3ft directly above the AP. I have been watching the signal
>> strenght and it has dropped to 86% (which is what it used to mostly
>> sit at) but has mostly been 90 - 100%. I don't know why it has so
>> much variance which it used to not have but with the range involved
>> 90+% seems more reasonable than 86-88% but the more constant numbers
>> seem more plausible so that one is a hard call.
>> Andy
>>
>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>> the mailing list <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>.
>> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <os2-wireless_users-off@2rosenthals.com>
>> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
>> <os2-wireless_users-digest@2rosenthals.com>
>> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to
>> <os2-wireless_users-index@2rosenthals.com>
>> Send administrative queries to
>> <os2-wireless_users-request@2rosenthals.com>
>> To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to:
>> <os2-wireless_users-on@2rosenthals.com> and reply to the
confirmation
>> email.
>>
>> This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
>> P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
>> electronic communications related to content
>> contained in these messages should be directed
>> to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
>>
>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>
>>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
> the mailing list <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <os2-wireless_users-off@2rosenthals.com>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
> <os2-wireless_users-digest@2rosenthals.com>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to
> <os2-wireless_users-index@2rosenthals.com>
> Send administrative queries to
> <os2-wireless_users-request@2rosenthals.com>
> To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to:
> <os2-wireless_users-on@2rosenthals.com> and reply to the confirmation
> email.
>
> This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
> P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
> electronic communications related to content
> contained in these messages should be directed
> to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <os2-wireless_users-off@2rosenthals.com>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
<os2-wireless_users-digest@2rosenthals.com>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to
<os2-wireless_users-index@2rosenthals.com>
Send administrative queries to
<os2-wireless_users-request@2rosenthals.com>
To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to:
<os2-wireless_users-on@2rosenthals.com> and reply to the confirmation
email.
This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
back to list