From: "Christian Langanke" Received: from mxout1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.165] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 549007 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:22:02 -0500 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GmaFn-000GCS-E3 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:21:56 -0500 Received: from waldorf.webpack.hosteurope.de ([217.115.142.71]) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GmaFm-000GBQ-RE for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:21:54 -0500 Received: by waldorf.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.51 using esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) from p50848828.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.132.136.40] helo=[172.32.16.111]) id 1GmaFG-0006qq-Hx; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:21:22 +0100 Message-ID: <45634378.6050402@clanganke.de> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:20:40 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (OS/2/20060915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Getting worse performance with the new xwlan 3.00 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Hi Kris, Kris Steenhaut wrote: > Christian Langanke wrote: >> >> > Hello, > > Coming back home I encountered quite a few glitches: > > - I couldn't connect to my router as long as the router's SSID resides > in the profile. Thus I needed to wipe out the SSID in the network > entry field in order to connect. This should not be that way. When I recall it correctly, you had problems with the SSIDs anyway. I mean, you were surprised that your home router was available at Cologne.. and it was just a router using the same network name... In any way this definitely is not an XWLAN issue. I will certainly try to help you finding out what the problem is, but for that we may need to use DesktopOnCall, so that I can access your box remotely. please drop me a personal mail if you would liek me to do this. > - Even when connected, transfers are rather jerky. Doable when MTU > had been set to 1492, but still a drop in quality in respect to > version 2.14. Looks to me the new feature has introduced a few new > problems. I would agree so far. I have similar problems with my netgear router, and since before the ship no tester reported the same, I thought it was just my hardware... > Bottom line: I'm back to version 2.14 till you have sorted it all out. > :-) Well, if you rely on fast downloads, you may have no other way. Otherwise I would stick to WPA, as WEP isn't safe at all anymore. But if you use WEP, at least see wikipedia.org for the recommendations for doing that - in order to be _somewhat_ secure. bye, Christian ------------------------------------------------- Christian Langanke COS2E & CWSE Team OS/2 Ruhr e.V. cla@clanganke.de