From: "Kris Steenhaut" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Message-ID: <4563A69D.3030307@kolibrieweg.eu>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:23:41 +0100
Organization: CFM$-FC (Coalition for Micro$oft-Free Computing)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; it-IT; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061110 SeaMonkey/1.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Getting worse performance with the new xwlan
 3.00
References: <list-549005@2rosenthals.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-549005@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Christian Langanke wrote:
> This should not be that way. When I recall it correctly, you had 
> problems with the SSIDs anyway. I mean, you were surprised that your 
> home router was available at Cologne..
Yes I was ... and saw an houre later they were fiddling there with exact 
the same router as I have: an SMC barricade. :-)

Anyway, I hadn't any problem with xwlan3.00 and genmac 2.00 whem I left 
home for Cologna.
> and it was just a router using the same network name... In any way 
> this definitely is not an XWLAN issue.
Could very well be.
> I will certainly try to help you finding out what the problem is, but 
> for that we may need to use DesktopOnCall, so that I can access your 
> box remotely. please drop me a personal mail if you would liek me to 
> do this.
>
You'll have to unveil your email address to me then. Remember, this list 
doesn't show the email addresses of the members.

That would be very useful of course.  DesktopOnCall is installed here 
since years (remember, the very 1st not classifies eCS edition).  I've 
no idea how to handle it, so you'll need to tell me.
>> - Even  when connected,  transfers are rather jerky. Doable when MTU 
>> had been set to 1492, but still a drop in quality in respect to 
>> version 2.14. Looks to me the new feature has introduced a few new 
>> problems.
>
> I would agree so far. I have similar problems with my netgear router, 
> and since before the ship no tester reported the same, I thought it 
> was just my hardware...
>
>> Bottom line: I'm back to version 2.14 till you have sorted it all 
>> out. :-)
> Well, if you rely on fast downloads, you may have no other way. 
> Otherwise I would stick to WPA, as WEP
Unlike at Cologna, there wasn't/isn't even WEP nor WPA activated here. 
So it looks like you'll have to correct me fast. :-)


-- 
Groeten uit Gent,

   Kris