From: "Ed Durrant" Received: from mxout3.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.167] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 609721 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:09:09 -0500 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GtfHc-0001Fn-Jd for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:09:08 -0500 Received: from omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com ([144.140.82.155]) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GtfHc-000PMf-4J for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:09:04 -0500 Received: from oaamta03ps.mx.bigpond.com ([124.189.184.88]) by omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20061211070850.TEYC24030.omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com@oaamta03ps.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:08:50 +0000 Received: from [192.168.30.2] (really [124.189.184.88]) by oaamta03ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20061211070850.PNKB1047.oaamta03ps.mx.bigpond.com@[192.168.30.2]> for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:08:50 +0000 Message-ID: <457D03FC.7030102@bigpond.net.au> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:08:44 +1100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0a1 (OS/2/20060803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Asus WL-330g problems References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at oaamta03ps.mx.bigpond.com from [124.189.184.88] using ID edurrant@bigpond.net.au at Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:08:50 +0000 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 144.140.82.155 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) Kris Steenhaut wrote: > Stanley Sidlov wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:39:32 +0100, Kris Steenhaut wrote: >> >> >>> >>> Most likely it has a different inbuild chip now. As I told, "standard >>> procedure". >>> >>> Just look at what is happening with the late IBM Thinkpad. (-: >>> >> >> Shouldn't matter, it's an EXTERNAL DEVICE not a PCMCIA card. >> >> > Please explain: why doesn't matter an EXTERNAL DEVICE with a different > chip? Different inbuild chip means different driver, so on the contrary > it a matter of working or non-working. Please exlain why not. > My understanding is that this is a totally external box, connected as a router to the system via ethernet - hence the drivers required on the PC are for the NIC port, not the WiFi unit. It's the sort of thing you plug into a Sony Playstation to make it wireless - i.e. it's Operating system agnostic. Cheers/2 Ed.