From: "Stanley Sidlov" Received: from mxout4.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.168] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 617731 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:24:15 -0500 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GuXpe-000JnX-NS for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:24:08 -0500 Received: from admin.nni.com ([216.107.0.100]) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GuXpd-0006Wj-PQ for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:23:49 -0500 X-Scan:Scanned for Virus By NuNet Received: from [67.81.238.77] (account stanleys@cybernex.net) by admin.nni.com (CommuniGate Pro POP 4.1.8) with XMIT id 546090880; Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:23:48 -0500 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:23:45 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: "Stanley Sidlov" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2300 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Verizon FIOS &$^(%&%^&*%^ ????? Message-ID: X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 216.107.0.100 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:53:07 -0800, Neil Waldhauer wrote: >I got 1475/413 result on DSL. I'm using an old laptop with InJoy firewall and I >suspect it's limiting the speed a little bit. The second number is way more >important than the first if you want to run servers. > >src="http://www.dslreports.com/im/20042772/20936.png"> Old hardware is certainly part of the problem. My 500mhz P3 doesn't go as fast as 1.3G P3 or the AMD 3800 when doing network tests. Firewalls and firewall software also add to the overhead, along with other processes running in the background on the system. Another issue is Selective ACK responses and it should be set so that the system doesn't respond to every packet, time stamping should be turned off, too. Send and Receive window size (a buffer), is also a significant issue at higher speeds. OS/2 will adjust somewhat automatically, but it's better to have a larger buffer than a smaller one at these speeds, and there a calculator at DSLREPORTS based on speed and latency. You can test what the settings are at DSLREPORTS (Broadbandreports) with the TWEAK Tool/Test. Use Free BSD as the OS when they ask, and it will give you some suggested settings and can tell what your TCPIP settings are. IT's suggested that you become 'pingable' to use the test fully. Use the inetcfg command to fix the tcpip stack parameters.