os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com ?????????????? ????? #1942

???: "Rick R." <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> ?? ????
?????????
??: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: xwlan profile access
??: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:45:26 -0800 (PST)
??: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>

Where can I download older versions of XWLAN center?

I'm trying to get back to that version which had fixed
the error where the XWLAN center always reports back
one lan interface higher than the # of available ones.
So if lan1 is the last interface, XWLAN reports back
"lan2 disabled" and so forth.

That used to be fixed, but now that error is back
again, so I'd like to downgrade if possible.


--- Christian Langanke
<os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> wrote:

> Jerry,
>
> I just read your mail about this very unusual setup.
> I can only congrat
> you for getting this to work, I never tried this
> ad-hoc stuff.
>
> Unfortunately, currently there is no way to send a
> message to the widget
> from outside. Communication with WPS objects  (here
> the xcenter),
> normally takes place via setup strings, REXX code
> for this would look
> somewhat like this;
>
> rc = SysSetObjectData('<XWP_XCENTER>',
> 'WIDGET=XWireless LAN
> Monitor(SETPROFILE=myPofile);');
>
>  This would require two things :first a keyword like
> WIDGET,telling
> XCenter that the string has to be passed over to the
> specified xcenter,
> second, an interface within the Widget API to
> receive such strings. None
> of the two is available, while the first isn't a big
> deal, but the
> second would be a major change to XWorkplace. As I
> think the widget
> concept of XCenter  needs some overhaul anyway, I
> don't see much sense
> in implementing such on top of the current concept,
> but I am not part of
> that project anyway.
>
> There is an alternative, of course, wich I can
> implement on side of
> XWLAN though. It would be possible to implement a
> proprietary inter
> process communication (IPC) between a utility and
> the active instance of
> XWLAN. An internal helper executable xwlprf.exe (not
> explicitely
> documented) is already part of the package. Among
> other actions that can
> be taken, it was intended to have a meaning to
> activate a profile before
> XWLAN gets active. It turned out though that this
> required the PM being
> initialized, while the requirement was to activate
> it in textmode, while
> processing config.sys, so this feature turned out to
> be quite useless.
> Moreover, if you try t set the profile with xwlprf
> while XWLAN is
> active, it has to refuse to work, as there is no
> communication yet
> implemented between the two, and modifying the XWLAN
> data directly may
> only be allowed for one program at a time. But I
> don't see a reason why
> an IPC couldn't be implemented to let xwlprf
> communicate with an active
> widget. This is a larger change though, and I don't
> expect it to come
> soon. Nevertheless I will put it onto my todo list,
> now that I know of a
> senseful used case :-)
>
> bye, Christian
>
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Christian Langanke
> COS2E & CWSE
> Team OS/2 Ruhr e.V.
> cla@clanganke.de
>
>
>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> This message is sent to you because you are
> subscribed to
>   the mailing list
> <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>.
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to:
> <os2-wireless_users-off@2rosenthals.com>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
> <os2-wireless_users-digest@2rosenthals.com>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to
> <os2-wireless_users-index@2rosenthals.com>
> Send administrative queries to
> <os2-wireless_users-request@2rosenthals.com>
> To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to:
> <os2-wireless_users-on@2rosenthals.com> and reply to
> the confirmation email.
>
> This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
> P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
> electronic communications related to content
> contained in these messages should be directed
> to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
>
>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

???????: ????, ??????, ??????.
?????????
??? ????????