From: "Kris Steenhaut" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from mxout2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.166] verified)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.1)
  with ESMTP id 48895 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 12:55:59 -0400
Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175])
	by mxout2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1FTidJ-000Lkb-HJ
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 12:55:57 -0400
Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.5.235])
	by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1FTidJ-0004N7-Ap
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 12:55:57 -0400
Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id k3CGti4I029501
        for <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:55:44 +0200
        (envelope-from <kris.steenhaut@hccnet.nl>)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (120.9-201-80.adsl.skynet.be [80.201.9.120])
        by outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id k3CGtfL9029464;
	Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:55:41 +0200
        (envelope-from <kris.steenhaut@hccnet.nl>)
Message-ID: <443D310F.8040408@hccnet.nl>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:55:43 +0200
Organization: CFM$-FC (Coalition for Micro$oft-Free Computing)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; it-IT; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922
X-Accept-Language: it, en, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Exactly which DLink 520 DWL PCI card !?
References: <list-48575@2rosenthals.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-48575@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)



Rick R. ha scritto:

> I still can't get that xwlan to work on my Thinkpad T42p.
> It just insists on choosing the first not(!) available IP interface.

Ugh!?

AFAIK there isn't  an inbuild "Dlink DWL-G520"  and surely not a "Dlink 
DWL-G520+ (104C,9066)" around at a TP42 (p).

So, would you be so kind to elaborate?

>  
> Rick
>
> */Kenn Yuill <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>/* wrote:
>
>
>     In case Kris Steenhaut doesn't have time to respond, he mentioned
>     the following PCI card in his posting of last Tuesday:
>
>     "Dlink DWL-G520+ (104C,9066)
>
>     Above is a "normal" pci card of which I have 3 working, and they
>     do work excellent. "
>
> --  Aloha,      Kenn  _________________________________________________________     Always act as if life is a joyous journey. - Kenn Yuill      Beautiful, Rustic Ottawa Valley, Ontario, Canada         Warp4 FP15 - Thunderbird 1.5 - Firefox 1.5                          -oOo-              _____ Quotation for Today _____    
>        Computers are like Old Testament gods;               lots of rules and no mercy.                   - Joseph Campbell  _________________________________________________________  
>
>
>
>     SYNass i-lists wrote as follows on 10/04/06 14:44:
>
>>Recently here was a DLink DWL-520+ PCi card mentioned !  I accidentally deleted these postings, sorry ;-(  Could you please name me the exact item once more please ?    Is DLink DWL-520+ or DWL-G520+ correct ??    TIA for your efforts and help ;-)    
>>
-- 
Groeten uit Gent,

   Kris