os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Messaggio archiviato #2101 | torna alla lista |
|
---|
Stan,Essentially, the unit functions as a bridge, so it connects two physically separated LAN segments. In a simple setup, one unit is connected to the broadband, has wired clients, serves up DHCP addresses, and functions as an access point for wireless clients. In addition, with WDS enabled, another unit (or units) connect(s) to this "main" one via Wi-Fi (and yes, the link may be encrypted with WPA or WEP). The second (and subsequent) unit(s) are configured for no DHCP and no routing (the WAN interface is disabled). Wired clients may be connected to it and their traffic bridged back to the main unit. Wireless clients are handled similarly.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:02:41 -0400 (EDT), Stanley Sidlov wrote:
...
Also, at $50/unit, it may be cheaper than buying several wireless cards/nics and supports 4 computers with wires. Also, since it's G wireless, you can use better encryption, and the clients can be hard wired to the router box rather than using the weaker WEP encryptions.
Ah, until you said that I hadn't realised that you can use it to relay a WiFi signal to *cabled* PCs - I thought you meant it was just for repeating the radio signal to other WiFi-equipped PCs! Now that would be a very handy thing to do...
I'd have to take Stan's word on this. I haven't seen stability issues with the 54G's I've got in the field. However, this does make sense.But, I have found with 6 computers, that having a Gigabyte SWITCH attached to the WRT for the wired computers, makes the WRT much more stable since the intranet load is reduced.
That's interesting - I imagine the switching behaviour takes processor cycles that otherwise can be used for WiFi activity. Not something I would ever considered.
Isriviti: Feed,
Riassunto,
Indice. Disiscriviti Scrivi a ListMaster |