De: |
"Bob" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> |
Encabezados Completos Mensaje no decodificado |
Enviador: |
os2-wireless_users-owner <os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com> |
Asunto: |
[OS2Wireless] anyone have GenMac and NETBIOS/TCPIP working? |
Fecha: |
Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:20:14 -0800 |
Para: |
os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com |
|
---|
** Reply to message from "Frank Vos frankvos@xs4all.nl" on Wed, 30 Nov 2005
01:49:47 +0100 (CET)
> I hope you have it working now (in this case no errors when starting up) with the
> help of the program or manual changing IBMLAN.INI.
No, it is not working. I thought it might be because I had "dhcpstrt -i lan0
-d 0" in the setup.cmd so I changed it to "dhcpstrt -i lan0 -d 20" which causes
a short delay and must be replied to if the wired LAN is not connected but that
did not make any difference. All this has been tried on the wired LAN
connection, I have not yet tried the wireless connections using TCPBEUI but
have little hope it will work either.
> To get TCPBEUI working with more than one adapter there is another problem.
> The problem with TCPBEUI is that the system binds this protocol to the adapter at
> system startup, so if your WIFI-adapter has no IP address at this moment than it will
> not have the TCPBEUI protocol.
Since I can not get it working, using TCPBEUI I think I will try and go back to
NETBIOS and see what I can do. At least it works on the wired LAN connection.
Can anyone tell me why using TCPBEUI is any better than using NETBIOS?
Is there any way to tell what protocols have been bound to an interface, it
might make trouble shooting this a little easier?
--
Robert Blair
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body
(omit the quotes).
For help with other commands, send a message
to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"help" in the body (omit the quotes).
This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|