DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=eYCPxPWjottGHVF2rbA7H0hT7qifjx3L1CnPaEm8Tf9Ex8BK1sq8Iqki26sJ6W0JVJ5lh2h0ZhZKEeIZoiCskko2oqJ66EnroLtdMHJb536SXa5a4Z+ytN+8rwtFXrcJydFOvD97g3Oesy8YsSaOBw1FYqQ4iJ/tcJs/iNmADtc=
Message-ID: <7234a03c0511092311m1c9ff2c4w42f6319d9bfabe5f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051109162747-27101-7@2rosenthals.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200511092010.jA9KAg1x017763@smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl>
	 <20051109162747-27101-7@2rosenthals.com>
Date:  Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:11:41 +0100
Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner <os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com>
Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
From:  Jeroen Besse <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
To:  os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
Subject: [OS2Wireless] No success with new GENMAC and Intel 2200

On 11/9/05, Jan van Wijk <jvw@dfsee.com> wrote:
> One culprit could be the kernel, I am using 14.104a, while 14.103a
> seems to be the current eCS 1.2 one ...
>
> Note that I DID have a more or less working GENMAC 0.90 beta
> a few months ago, but that was with an older kernel ...

I upgraded my kernel from 14.100c to 14.104a, and (so far) it runs
fine. So if it's a kernel issue, it's only a kernel issue for the 2200
card you have.

--
Best regards,
Jeroen Besse
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body
(omit the quotes).

For help with other commands, send a message
to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"help" in the body (omit the quotes).

This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=