| Mailing List os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Archived Message #2405 |  
 
back to list | 
  | 
|---|
Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:<snip>
This is true. The nice thing about Citrix is that it runs on a completely different machine, and so no matter the load on the other box, the only real stress on the client is the single Citrix app (there are times, however, when the overhead of caching images from the session can be rather intensive; I tend to shy away from running too many streaming media apps in Citrix for this very reason). Also, some apps simply do not like to run (or install, as is usually the case) in a terminal session.For me, however, things are a bit more involved. I usually have Mozilla running with a dozen or so tabs open, Mozilla Mail, Citrix, Lotus Organizer, and probably a handful of other things and I rotate between them fairly regularly. I do try to keep some of the constantly-polling DOS apps shut down until I need them (Lotus 1-2-3 2.4, is an example), and I've taken to running most of the Win16 apps under W2K in the Citrix session. This saves me CPU cycles as well as RAM resources.
Citrix sounds like a much better virtualizer than either VPC
or SVISTA. I only use VPC, and only when I must. However,
the apps that I attempt to run under VPC are mostly hogs such
as Acrobat that don't show it at its best.
| 
Subscribe: Feed,
Digest,
Index. Unsubscribe Mail to ListMaster  |