From: "Stuart Updike" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2003656 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:24:38 -0400 Received-SPF: none (secmgr-ny.randr: 209.86.89.67 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mindspring.com) client-ip=209.86.89.67; envelope-from=stuupdike@mindspring.com; helo=elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net; Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67]) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRCyI-0007Bi-6z for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:24:38 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=GvXiXgYY32dy8hX7de/jOgAQScy2k0ZHpm8hyWnytA+ZiRdNVXUv1ROk9+kTD8NT; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [70.216.228.157] by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KRCyG-0007pa-L9 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:24:33 -0400 Message-ID: <489B680B.6030506@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:24:27 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070306 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] TOT I think my T21 is dead References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 981bdc70bc1884855b59645513f9ec4240683398e744b8a4786eff2ccef06686026d2d0d6c1be94da7ce0e8f8d31aa3f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 70.216.228.157 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.3 SARE_WEOFFER BODY: Offers Something 0.5 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > I have found nothing offensive in Dave's posting. There is no rule > that non-OS/2 operating systems not be mentioned, though the thrust of > this list is on wireless communications under OS/2 and eCS. Dave's > problem may have something to do with a networking card of some sort, > and as the list has been rather quiet of late (in fact, many > OS/2-related lists have been quiet these past couple of months), I > didn't think there would be much objection to a clearly-labeled OT > thread. Understanding how few we OS/2 - eCS users are, I think anything we can do to assist one of our own should be done. I would very much prefer that we offer whatever help we can, whenever and wherever we can. Stuart Updike Bedford, Texas USA