X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 2152 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from 192.168.100.5 (hawking [192.168.100.5]) by 2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20050721060608-32512-8 ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:06:08 -0400 (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20050721060606-63044-8 ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:06:07 -0400 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DvXx4-0000Qa-Uz for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:06:51 -0400 Received: from mail4.tpgi.com.au ([203.12.160.61] helo=mail.tpg.com.au) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DvXx4-000Jq9-A1 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:06:50 -0400 Received: from study (220-244-239-53-sa-pppoe.tpgi.com.au [220.244.239.53]) by mail.tpg.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6LA6joE000351 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:06:47 +1000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (study [192.168.0.2]) by study (Weasel v1.72) for ; 21 Jul 2005 19:36:26 +0930 Message-ID: <42DF73A2.6060503@smedley.info> User-Agent: Mail/News Client 1.0+ (OS/2/20050713) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <821.21.22.22.20.07.2005@constellation.carrier> In-Reply-To: <821.21.22.22.20.07.2005@constellation.carrier> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail.smedley.info X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:36:26 +0930 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Paul Smedley To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] GENPRISM X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com Hi Guys, Larry Tawa wrote: > In <127551.13.20.17.20.07.2005@constellation.carrier>, on 07/20/2005 > at 01:18 PM, "Bob" said: >> ** Reply to message from "Kris Steenhaut kris.steenhaut@hccnet.nl" on >> Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:55:40 +0200 > >>>> Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless LAN 2100 3B Mini PCI Adapter >>>> >>> That's not a genprism compatible device. >>> Can't work, doesn't work, no way. (-: > >> I know that. When I said I was looking forward to having to the windows >> drivers that are patched to be used with OS/2 I was not referring to >> anything to do with the GENPRISM drivers. The GENPRISM driver is being >> used with a Linksys Instant Wireless Network PC Card. I would much >> prefer to use the internal wireless NIC and not have to use the PC Card >> that I now use, mainly because it appears that the internal NIC has a >> much greater range than the PC Card. > >> So is there another driver that can work with either NIC? > > You may have missed this recently posted on the yahoo ecomstation mailing > list by Roderick Klein: > > "1. Wireless NIC support. > > There is a closed beta of a driver to load windows network drivers under > OS/2/eComStation. Its working except more news on this in the coming 2 to > 3 months. > (thats an estimate). This will support the mayor 7 wireless chipsets." > > From prior posts in other mailing lists, IMO, I am confident that the PCI > Adapter Intel 2200 will be covered which is what my T42 has. As for the > 2100, do not know. AFAK - the Intel 2100 is working pretty well now with ndiswrapper - however 2200BG isn't working reliably here, at least with my laptop. Cheers, Paul. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=