Message-Id: <200412181526.iBIFQ5bN005136@ns2.cruzio.com>
In-Reply-To: <0I8X00DITBN02B50@mxout1.netvision.net.il>
References: <0I8V00MBU4RH83@mxout5.netvision.net.il> <41C43D5F.3060604@clanganke.de> 
	<0I8X00DITBN02B50@mxout1.netvision.net.il>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date:  Sat, 18 Dec 2004 07:26:37 -0800
Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner <os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com>
Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
From:  "Neil Waldhauer" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
To:  os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
Subject: [OS2Wireless] PCMCIA, Cisco 352, and Thinkpad T21

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:13:44 +0200, Stan Goodman <sgood@hashkedim.com> wrote:

> For example I was told yesterday in ecomstation. support.networking that it
> would be a good idea to run the Cisco 340 driver from Hobbes before changing to
> the Beta driver that supports XWLAN, in order to get the benefit of WEP. That
> would not have been in your INF file.

Perhaps it will work for you. I don't need the level of WEP the old driver
offers, only WEP128.  Plus I need to change from unencrypted to WEP128 and
back. So the Cisco 350 is only useful to me for the unencrypted access points.

The advantage of the Cisco 350 is that it will work very well with those public
sites. Because the radio component is better, when I'm competing with every
other user in the cafe for bandwidth, I'll have an advantage.

Neil
-- 
Neil Waldhauer, neil@blondeguy.com

It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body
(omit the quotes).

For help with other commands, send a message
to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"help" in the body (omit the quotes).

This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=