X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 30453 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from 192.168.100.5 (hawking [192.168.100.5]) by 2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20041027060226-30298-7 ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 06:02:26 -0400 (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20041027060223-25537-7 ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 06:02:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.170]) by mxout1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CMkdX-000GmN-Rg for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 06:02:39 -0400 Received: from 213-152-37-93.dsl.eclipse.net.uk ([213.152.37.93] helo=mail.warpix.org) by mx1.mailhop.org with smtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CMkdX-000KPY-Fv for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 06:02:35 -0400 Received: from tp600.warpix.org by mail.warpix.org (IBM OS/2 SENDMAIL VERSION 2.03/2.0) id LAA617.68; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:02:35 +0100 Received: by tp600.warpix.org (IBM OS/2 SENDMAIL VERSION 2.03/2.0) id LAA273.89; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:01:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20041027110150.C84@warpix.org> References: <20041026204508.U84@warpix.org> <417F4CAE.7050604@clanganke.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.94.15i In-Reply-To: <417F4CAE.7050604@clanganke.de>; from Christian Langanke on Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:22:22AM +0200 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS.org X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:01:50 +0100 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: John Poltorak To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] OS/2 based Router/AP X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:22:22AM +0200, Christian Langanke wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > > >Is there any chance of being able to build an OS/2 based router and access > >point? > > > >What would it need? AFAICS a NIC and device driver for the ADSL port would > >be sufficient although I doubt whether an OS/2 driver existed. Linux > >drivers are available for some cards - maybe they could be ported... > > > eCS V1.1. already has everything required at least for the router stuff. > The OEM version of ISDNPM included in that CS, a.k.a. eCSCoNet can run > PPP over Ethernet over every nic having an OS/2 driver. Use my Internet > Assistant (also included in eCS V1.1) to configure that thing half > automatically, otherwise you end up in configuring two rather conplex > ASCII config files with tons of options. In the UK, all broadband runs over PPPoA, so I would have any protocol support. But even more important there are no ADSL NICs with OS/2 drivers, so the whole project is a non-starter. Some such NICs do have Linux drivers available, but whether they could be ported to OS/2 is a different matter. > Concerning the access point, you would need a PCI (or even ISA ?) PCMCIA > adapter card for a desktop PC with required drivers (direct drivers or > socket drivers for the PCMCIA part of the adapter card). To my knowledge > this will be rather difficult, but there may still be an existing > solution available out there. I didn't think it would be difficult to configure a PCI/PCMCIA adapter... > Due to several reasons I though would recommend not to go for such a > aolsution, but rather buy a standalone access point with DSL festures, > even if is (and it does not necessarily have to be) more expensive. > > First, real access points (mostly with DSL included) are cheaper than > 100$ (here e.g. 60 to 70 EUR for a brand new NetGear device), mostly > having a complete firewall and DHCP, DDNS support and other features > inclusive. So beside avoiding the hunt for drivers you get extra > functionality right away. Cost isn't the issue here - it's simply a pet project of mine. > Second, such a device will likely consume less power when running (all > day?). A server runs all day anyway, so it wouldn't make any difference. The reason I would want to have router/AP functinality in an OS/2 box is so that it could be used as single gateway to the Internet and act as a super server. > Third, if you use a PCMCIA card in a desktop system, you should use one > with a very good bult-in or external antenna, bothmay or will cost you > additional money. Otherwise this solution will have poorer radio > characteristics than every access point that you could attach everywhere > at the wall. The best vertical position for an access point is the > highest possible, and that will be kind of a problem with a PCMCIA card > being plugged into a desktop PC, having no external antenna. Are there any wireless cards which can be used with external antennas? > thanx, Christian > > ------------------------------------------------- > > Christian Langanke > COS2E & CWSE > Team OS/2 Ruhr e.V. > cla@clanganke.de > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -- John =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=