On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:22:22AM +0200, Christian Langanke wrote:
> John Poltorak wrote:
>
> >Is there any chance of being able to build an OS/2 based router and access
> >point?
> >
> >What would it need? AFAICS a NIC and device driver for the ADSL port would
> >be sufficient although I doubt whether an OS/2 driver existed. Linux
> >drivers are available for some cards - maybe they could be ported...
> >
> eCS V1.1. already has everything required at least for the router stuff.
> The OEM version of ISDNPM included in that CS, a.k.a. eCSCoNet can run
> PPP over Ethernet over every nic having an OS/2 driver. Use my Internet
> Assistant (also included in eCS V1.1) to configure that thing half
> automatically, otherwise you end up in configuring two rather conplex
> ASCII config files with tons of options.
In the UK, all broadband runs over PPPoA, so I would have any protocol
support. But even more important there are no ADSL NICs with OS/2 drivers,
so the whole project is a non-starter. Some such NICs do have Linux
drivers available, but whether they could be ported to OS/2 is a different
matter.
> Concerning the access point, you would need a PCI (or even ISA ?) PCMCIA
> adapter card for a desktop PC with required drivers (direct drivers or
> socket drivers for the PCMCIA part of the adapter card). To my knowledge
> this will be rather difficult, but there may still be an existing
> solution available out there.
I didn't think it would be difficult to configure a PCI/PCMCIA adapter...
> Due to several reasons I though would recommend not to go for such a
> aolsution, but rather buy a standalone access point with DSL festures,
> even if is (and it does not necessarily have to be) more expensive.
>
> First, real access points (mostly with DSL included) are cheaper than
> 100$ (here e.g. 60 to 70 EUR for a brand new NetGear device), mostly
> having a complete firewall and DHCP, DDNS support and other features
> inclusive. So beside avoiding the hunt for drivers you get extra
> functionality right away.
Cost isn't the issue here - it's simply a pet project of mine.
> Second, such a device will likely consume less power when running (all
> day?).
A server runs all day anyway, so it wouldn't make any difference.
The reason I would want to have router/AP functinality in an OS/2 box is
so that it could be used as single gateway to the Internet and act as a
super server.
> Third, if you use a PCMCIA card in a desktop system, you should use one
> with a very good bult-in or external antenna, bothmay or will cost you
> additional money. Otherwise this solution will have poorer radio
> characteristics than every access point that you could attach everywhere
> at the wall. The best vertical position for an access point is the
> highest possible, and that will be kind of a problem with a PCMCIA card
> being plugged into a desktop PC, having no external antenna.
Are there any wireless cards which can be used with external antennas?
> thanx, Christian
>
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Christian Langanke
> COS2E & CWSE
> Team OS/2 Ruhr e.V.
> cla@clanganke.de
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
John
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body
(omit the quotes).
For help with other commands, send a message
to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"help" in the body (omit the quotes).
This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
back to list