Message-ID: <20041027095726.Y84@warpix.org>
References: <5778-SnapperMsg4EDDFFFDBDA49BFE@68.246.129.162>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <5778-SnapperMsg4EDDFFFDBDA49BFE@68.246.129.162>; from Lewis G Rosenthal on Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:27:00PM -0400
Date:  Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:57:26 +0100
Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner <os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com>
Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
From:  John Poltorak <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
To:  os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
Subject: [OS2Wireless] OS/2 based Router/AP

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:27:00PM -0400, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:
> The real value would be not in a little box, but something like 
> NoCatSplash, where a workstation functions as an AP and/or broadband router.

This is the sort of thing I was thinking of - a sort of router/gateway 
acting as a superserver to an internal network with a real IP address on 
one side and an internal IP address on the other. Using an internal IP 
network you wouldn't need a firewall and NAT on every machine, all clients 
would access the Internet via a proxy or socks server on the gateway 
machine which could also act as an imap mail server.

-- 
John
 


 
> True, Mark, the embedded systems are fairly slim compared to 'doze, but by 
> the time you get a working IP stack on it, you're already at several MB. 
> You'd then need some way to configure it (telnet or...yikes!...browser). I 
> think the Linux builds are tighter than this by 50-60% (best guess). I 
> agree that it might be fun for the excersize, but... :-)
> 
> BTW, glad you made it home safe & sound. Thanks for a really great eent 
> this year.
> ___
> Lewis
> ___
> Lewis G Rosenthal
> Rosenthal & Rosenthal
> Sent via SnapperMail
> 
> 
> ...... Original Message .......
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 19:35:54 -0400 madodel@ptdprolog.net wrote:
> >In <5760-SnapperMsg4EDDFFFDBDA4801D@68.246.129.162>, on 10/26/04 at 06:27
> >PM,
> >   Lewis G Rosenthal <lgrosenthal@2rosenthals.com> said:
> >
> >>You'd need to squeeze the OS/2 install down quite a bit. From where I
> >>sit,  that's the biggest problem, John. Check out the size of one of the
> >>embedded  Linux distros...
> >
> >>I know that OS/2 has been used in embedded apps before, but I doubt that 
> >>the installs have been that small.
> >
> >I thought the embedded ones just use the bare basic.  No PMSHELL, no WPS,
> >no MMOS2, no support apps and utilities, just the kernel and loader,
> >command processor, file system, minimal required drivers and a TCP/IP
> >stack.  I would think that would be pretty small compared to windoze if
> >you could even do it with windoze, but I have no idea what a stripped down
> >Linux is like.  Its my understanding that many if not most of the routers
> >out there already use a stripped down Linux, so I'm not sure what would be
> >the point of trying this with OS/2 other then to show it can be done.
> >
> >Mark
> >
> >-- 


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body
(omit the quotes).

For help with other commands, send a message
to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"help" in the body (omit the quotes).

This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=