X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 534 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from 192.168.100.5 (hawking [192.168.100.5]) by 2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20050217233431-23491-7 ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:34:31 -0500 (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20050217233430-61978-7 ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:34:30 -0500 Received: from mx1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.170]) by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D1zqY-000LAS-3n for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:34:30 -0500 Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.61]) by mx1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1D1zqX-0001Af-VM for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:34:30 -0500 Received: from [66.32.4.168] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D1zqX-0004O3-FE for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:34:29 -0500 Message-ID: <42157040.4090200@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040819 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <42151D4D.7050108@mindspring.com> are installed <200502180226.j1I2QTwp099362@ns2.cruzio.com> In-Reply-To: <200502180226.j1I2QTwp099362@ns2.cruzio.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 981bdc70bc1884855b59645513f9ec4240683398e744b8a49849fe92aa705b54e2182127236b59143ca473d225a0f487350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.32.4.168 X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:34:08 -0600 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Stuart Updike To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] File and Print Sharing becomes inop when two NIC adapters X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com Neil Waldhauer wrote: >The way I use wireless, I leave off any kind of NETBIOS from the wireless NIC. >That way, everything works. I arrived at that when I realized that my Access >Point wasn't going to work with any kind of NETBIOS, so I was wasting my time >trying to get it to bind to my wireless NIC. > >When I want to mount a drive using wireless, I use NetDrive. It isn't as good >as NetBIOS, but it works. > >Neil > > Hi Neil, I will freely admit that I don't know much about networking, but as I understand it, I need the netbios when I wish to share files, etc with Windows machines on the network. Is that true? Also, everything works beautifully as long as I have only one adapter installed. It makes no difference whether it is the Intel wired or the Cisco wireless. Would that indicate that maybe I don't have the network set up properly? Thank you, Stu Updike Bedford, Texas USA =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=