In-Reply-To: <E1Cz0Fj-0003YZ-00@pop-a065d19.pas.sa.earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <auto-000379955885@admin.nni.com>
Date:  Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:50:00 -0500 (EST)
Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner <os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com>
Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
From:  "Stanley Sidlov" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
To:  "os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: [OS2Wireless] 802.11g

On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:24:00 -0500 (EST), Jeffrey Smick wrote:

>On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:11:18 -0800, Neil Waldhauer wrote:
>
>>Maybe so in Italy. But in USA, it is 802.11g that is useless. A cheap
>>connection is likely to be DSL or a Cable modem in the USA. Both these
>>connections are far slower than 803.11b, at least for most subscribers. So, for
>>all the connections I'm likely to see, 802.11b is exactly the same speed as
>>802.11g.
>
>Yes, but you are only considering communications with the internet. For LAN activities the higher speed would be useful 
>and useable.

Then we had better start thinking about "N" type drivers, as the Pre-N routers and cards are now comming out, and we need to catch up with the market. N cards could connect to A,B,G networks. N networks don't slow down when other types of cards connect. 


Stan Sidlov
--
http://www.warpstock.org

 Warpstock 2004 wasin Denver, Colorado! October 21-24, what WERE YOU doing that weekend?

 


 







=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body
(omit the quotes).

For help with other commands, send a message
to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"help" in the body (omit the quotes).

This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=