X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 47102 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from 192.168.100.5 (hawking [192.168.100.5]) by 2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20050209175757-10502-7 ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:57:58 -0500 (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20050209175756-50462-7 ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:57:56 -0500 Received: from mx1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.170]) by mxout2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz0mR-0006DK-DC for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:57:55 -0500 Received: from mxout4.netvision.net.il ([194.90.9.27]) by mx1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1Cz0mR-000CvL-6g for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:57:55 -0500 Received: from poblano ([217.132.166.238]) by mxout4.netvision.net.il (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0IBO00AWV2FT7V@mxout4.netvision.net.il> for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:57:35 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: Message-id: <0IBO00AWW2FT7V@mxout4.netvision.net.il> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25a; build=1965 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer-Platform: OS/2; architecture=x86; version=20.45 X-Mailer-Java-VM: IBM Corporation; version=JDK 1.1.8 IBM build o118-20010426 (JIT javax V3.5-IBMJDK1.1-20010426); compiler=javax References: <200502080010.j180ABf0042472@ns2.cruzio.com> X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:57:29 +0200 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Stan Goodman To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] 802.11g X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com ** Reply to message from Jeffrey Smick on Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:24:00 -0500 (EST) > On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:11:18 -0800, Neil Waldhauer wrote: > > >Maybe so in Italy. But in USA, it is 802.11g that is useless. A cheap > >connection is likely to be DSL or a Cable modem in the USA. Both these > >connections are far slower than 803.11b, at least for most subscribers. So, for > >all the connections I'm likely to see, 802.11b is exactly the same speed as > >802.11g. > > Yes, but you are only considering communications with the internet. For LAN > activities the higher speed would be useful > and useable. No doubt this is so. But most people, those in small LANs, certainly, spend most of their communicating time opposite the Internet, rather than with other stations on the LAN. Large LANs are probably cabled rather than wireless, so irrelevant for the comparison. If those statements are true, there isn't much advantage, if any, to the faster standard in the US or here either. It's something for T1 and T3 subscribers to think about, however; how many of those are there here? > Quote Of The Moment: > "Great minds discuss ideas. > Average minds discuss events. > Small minds discuss people." > -Admiral Hyman George Rickover > > Quote Of Our Time: > "War is the terrorism of the rich, whilst terrorism is the war of the poor." > -Peter Ustinov Quote For Eternity, subsuming both the above: "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson -- Stan Goodman Qiryat Tiv'on Israel "When your enemy falls, do not rejoice." -- Proverbs 24:17 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=