X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 46735 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from 192.168.100.5 (hawking [192.168.100.5]) by 2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20050207191014-13534-8 ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:10:14 -0500 (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20050207191013-37618-8 ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:10:13 -0500 Received: from mx1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.170]) by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyIxI-0007XW-L2 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:10:12 -0500 Received: from ns2.cruzio.com ([63.249.95.7]) by mx1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CyIxI-000Cgf-ES for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:10:12 -0500 Received: from dsl3-63-249-68-30.cruzio.com (dsl3-63-249-68-30.cruzio.com [63.249.68.30]) by ns2.cruzio.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id j180ABf0042472 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:10:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neil@blondeguy.com) Message-Id: <200502080010.j180ABf0042472@ns2.cruzio.com> In-Reply-To: <4207F5D9.3050603@ecomstation.it> References: <1Cxn47-1GgBcG0@fwd05.sul.t-online.com> <4207F5D9.3050603@ecomstation.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25a; build=1965 X-Mailer-Platform: OS/2; architecture=x86; version=20.45 X-Mailer-Java-VM: IBM Corporation; version=J2RE 1.3.1 IBM build co131-20031021 (JIT enabled: jitc); compiler=jitc X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:11:18 -0800 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: "Neil Waldhauer" To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] 802.11g X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:12:25 +0100, "Massimo @ eCS.it" wrote: > 802.11b is so slow and obsolete to be quite useless nowadays... Maybe so in Italy. But in USA, it is 802.11g that is useless. A cheap connection is likely to be DSL or a Cable modem in the USA. Both these connections are far slower than 803.11b, at least for most subscribers. So, for all the connections I'm likely to see, 802.11b is exactly the same speed as 802.11g. While I support the concept of the faster standard, 802.11g, the devices running it always fall back to 802.11b, so I don't ever see any difference. So for the present, I am quite happy with my 802.11b support. I hope that we get to try GENMAC, once it is ready, in this group, along with an XWLAN that gives us access to the newer features of the drivers. Neil -- Neil Waldhauer, neil@blondeguy.com If work is so terrific, how come they have to pay you to do it? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=