X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 46344 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from 192.168.100.5 (hawking [192.168.100.5]) by 2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20050205141526-59627-7 ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:15:26 -0500 (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20050205141524-57898-7 ; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:15:24 -0500 Received: from mx1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.170]) by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CxVOu-000GmS-2p for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:15:24 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]) by mx1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CxVOt-0005fa-Ud for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:15:24 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.37] (c-24-9-118-46.client.comcast.net[24.9.118.46]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005020519151301500aq7kee>; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 19:15:14 +0000 Message-ID: <42051B41.2090300@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050201 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0068529530.000009JG@pooh@deezee.org> In-Reply-To: <0068529530.000009JG@pooh@deezee.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:15:13 -0700 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Andy Willis To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] Using VPC with wifi X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com Dave Saville wrote: >On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 11:26:09 -0700, Andy Willis wrote: > > > >>I assume then that the virtual switch is on Lan0? Ok, that would get >>around putting the wireless card into promiscuous mode. It is >>essentially what svista is doing for its networking support. Do you >>have a physical card in the machine associated to LAN0? IOW, I have 2 >>pcmcia cards - one wirelese, one wired, and they are not in the machine >>at the same time and I am wondering if the card would have to be present >>though not in use otherwise. Unfortunately, my router doesn't allow me >>to play with the routing in it (going to have to get a new router I think). >>Andy >> >> > >Yes, LAN0 and yes you would need a card in there - but not a pcmcia one for the >LAN as VPC does not see the card slots. Or so I was told. Stan seems to have >got virtual switch working with his. > > > Virtual switch works fine with my wired card. it doens't work with wireless, wireless cards can't go into promiscuous mode. For use with a wireless card requires using NAT. This is not ideal with my situation as I need to put a socks server on the windows system and connect to it from the host OS/2 system. I can do this fine with the wired card but I don't remember the registry settings to open the NAT ports so I can't do it with my wireless card. Andy =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=