| Mailing List os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Archived Message #4078 |  
 
back to list | 
  | 
|---|
No. "Default route" or "default router" or "default gateway" implies the "most direct route from this network to another." As all Wi-Fi clients in the hotspot are on the same network, the default route has no bearing whatsoever. The Sputnik AP simply does not act as a regular hub in its native mode. Instead, it acts as a partitioned smart hub, meaning it cordons off each attached client from seeing the other. In this manner, it appears to each client as though it (the client) is the only node on the network, even though all of the clients share a common subnet address. So, if we have five clients on the 192.168.1.0 subnet, numbered from 1 through 5, 192.168.1.1 cannot ping .2, .3, .4, or .5. It can, however, ping 4.2.2.2 (one of the root servers on the net), as that goes through its default gateway (say, 192.168.1.100, or whatever the AP's address is - the Sputnik AP actually combines a router in the same box as the AP).BSS (Basic Service Set) defines the use of an AP to pass station-to-station traffic. in fact, the Sputnik managed access points which we are now deploying in hotspots (www.sputnik.com) specifically preclude station-to-station transport through the AP for security reasons (e.g., if I get an IP of 192.168.1.10, and you get an IP of 192.168.1.11, we cannot ping one another).
Presumably they can if the AP is set as the default route...
It's not a NIC. It's a bridge which connects directly to the PCI bus, instead of connecting via ethernet. (I know, I know...I'm splitting hairs). :-) Seriously, though, an OS/2 box configured as an AP could very well do with just a NIC to go to an external bridge (and would be more flexible in its placement). Neat card, though. Thanks for the link!!The lack of drivers isn;t the entire issue, I don't think. Essentially, in order to function as an AP, the driver needs to be set into promiscuous mode. If Jens' drivers don't do this, implementing it shouldn't be a big deal, as this is fairly well documented. Once that's out of the way, I would guess that my initial knee-jerk response was overly pessimistic. You're right about the routing issue, though an AP - by definition - doesn't route; it bridges. This, however, shouldn't be difficult to do.In answer to your initial question, I would imagine that it is possible to build an OS/2-based AP. It would be quite an undertaking, though!Well, it's basically an absence of drivers. I don't think any software exists which would enable an OS/2 system to work in Infrastruture mode, but I would have thought it could simply be used as a router to the Internet, if only there were OS/2 drivers for an ADSL NIC.
Also, there's no such thing as an ADSL NIC, AFAIK.
Really?
Check this:-
http://www.solwise.co.uk/adsl-pci.htm
And you might find the following link interesting, as well:You would use a NIC to connect to an ADSL bridge, which would be considered part of the customer premise equipment. IOW, the OS/2 box would have two NICs: one wired and one 802.11. The 802.11 would have to be put into promiscuous mode, and there would need to be some facility for allowing it to beacon (announce its SSID), I would imagine (it can be done without beaconing, but every client would have to have the SSID in order to associate). security would be another consideration (WEP, WPA, 802.11i, EAP, etc.).
Here is something I would like to do using OS/2:-
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-wap.html
I don't know. I don't see the real advantage vis-à-vis using an external bridge.
But I would like to stick an ADSL-PCI card in as well.
I suppose I can dream :-)....
If I managed to build such a box I could stick all my server software on it such as mail/web/ftp/dns as well as a proxy server and provide a gateway to an internal network, ie a box which you can just plug into a telco socket and provide instant access for a number of users. I'm sure a proxy server would provide better Internet access than having several users accessing the Internet individually. You could also build in some access control. I don't see how you could do it otherwise.In this scenario, yes, the all-in-one ADSL bridge card would come in handy. I see where you're headed, now. The proxy also gives you the best security, even beyond NAT.
| 
Subscribe: Feed,
Digest,
Index. Unsubscribe Mail to ListMaster  |