X-UIDL: 3584 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from mail.2rosenthals.com (localhost [127.0.0.1] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:56:26 -0500 Received: from mail1.no-ip.com (mail1.no-ip.com [63.215.241.221] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:56:25 -0500 X-Envelope-To: Received: (qmail 26550 invoked by uid 89); 10 Dec 2003 22:55:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.warpix.org) (213.152.37.93) by mail1.no-ip.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 22:55:36 -0000 Received: from tp600.warpix.org by mail.warpix.org (IBM OS/2 SENDMAIL VERSION 2.03/2.0) id WAA581.89; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:56:07 GMT Received: by tp600.warpix.org (IBM OS/2 SENDMAIL VERSION 2.03/2.0) id WAA419.29; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:56:04 GMT Message-ID: <20031210225604.C41728@warpix.org> References: <20031209125746.C1707@warpix.org> <3FD6204F.2070600@rollanet.org> <20031210135234.I1707@warpix.org> <3FD72962.5060807@2rosenthals.com> <20031210144526.K1707@warpix.org> <3FD7977F.5050007@2rosenthals.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.94.15i In-Reply-To: <3FD7977F.5050007@2rosenthals.com>; from Lewis G Rosenthal on Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:00:31PM -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:56:04 +0000 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: John Poltorak To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] OS/2 Access Point X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:00:31PM -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > John - > > On 12/10/2003 09:45 am, John Poltorak thus wrote : > > >On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 09:10:42AM -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > > > > > >>All traffic must pass through the AP. There is no direct > >>station-to-station traffic. > >> > >> > > > >Of course there is! > > > > > > > Not in infrastructire mode. Obviously some misunderstanding here. I thought you meant there was no direct station-to-station traffic in *any* circumstances... > BSS (Basic Service Set) defines the use of > an AP to pass station-to-station traffic. in fact, the Sputnik managed > access points which we are now deploying in hotspots (www.sputnik.com) > specifically preclude station-to-station transport through the AP for > security reasons (e.g., if I get an IP of 192.168.1.10, and you get an > IP of 192.168.1.11, we cannot ping one another). Presumably they can if the AP is set as the default route... > >>In answer to your initial question, I would imagine that it is possible > >>to build an OS/2-based AP. It would be quite an undertaking, though! > >> > >> > > > >Well, it's basically an absence of drivers. I don't think any software > >exists which would enable an OS/2 system to work in Infrastruture mode, > >but I would have thought it could simply be used as a router to the > >Internet, if only there were OS/2 drivers for an ADSL NIC. > > > > > > > The lack of drivers isn;t the entire issue, I don't think. Essentially, > in order to function as an AP, the driver needs to be set into > promiscuous mode. If Jens' drivers don't do this, implementing it > shouldn't be a big deal, as this is fairly well documented. Once that's > out of the way, I would guess that my initial knee-jerk response was > overly pessimistic. You're right about the routing issue, though an AP - > by definition - doesn't route; it bridges. This, however, shouldn't be > difficult to do. > > Also, there's no such thing as an ADSL NIC, AFAIK. Really? Check this:- http://www.solwise.co.uk/adsl-pci.htm > You would use a NIC > to connect to an ADSL bridge, which would be considered part of the > customer premise equipment. IOW, the OS/2 box would have two NICs: one > wired and one 802.11. The 802.11 would have to be put into promiscuous > mode, and there would need to be some facility for allowing it to beacon > (announce its SSID), I would imagine (it can be done without beaconing, > but every client would have to have the SSID in order to associate). > security would be another consideration (WEP, WPA, 802.11i, EAP, etc.). Here is something I would like to do using OS/2:- http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-wap.html But I would like to stick an ADSL-PCI card in as well. I suppose I can dream :-).... If I managed to build such a box I could stick all my server software on it such as mail/web/ftp/dns as well as a proxy server and provide a gateway to an internal network, ie a box which you can just plug into a telco socket and provide instant access for a number of users. I'm sure a proxy server would provide better Internet access than having several users accessing the Internet individually. You could also build in some access control. I don't see how you could do it otherwise. > -- > Lewis > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA > Rosenthal & Rosenthal > Accountants / Network Consultants > New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com > Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com > ------------------------------------------------------------ > This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 05:38 hours and 29 seconds > -- John =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=