From: "Ed Durrant" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2342939 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:48:33 -0500 Received: from static-71-171-102-26.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([71.171.102.26] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1LdyCk-00028o-Kx for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:48:33 -0500 Received: from nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com ([61.9.168.140]:44564) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LdyCf-0000x1-04 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:48:25 -0500 Received: from nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com ([121.216.213.66]) by nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20090302024821.TBGH24984.nskntmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 02:48:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.2] (really [121.216.213.66]) by nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20090302024821.LOAT19114.nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com@[192.168.100.2]> for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 02:48:21 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010203.49AB48F9.00AA,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-ID: <49AB48F4.6070400@durrant.mine.nu> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:48:20 +1100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (OS/2/20070731) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: (OT:): JAVA SIP CLIENT References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com from [121.216.213.66] using ID edward.durrant@bigpond.com at Mon, 2 Mar 2009 02:48:20 +0000 X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150202.49AB48F5.0045,ss=1,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ Ed Durrant wrote: > Andy Willis wrote: > >> Anyhow, I got to thinking Ed. Did you download the 1.4.2_09 or do >> you have 1.4.2_05? I haven't tried the latter with 1.5. >> Also did you get the JRE or SDK version of 1.4.2 and did you get the >> matching 1.5? e.g. sdk 1.4.2 ad 1.5 or jre 1.4.2 and 1.5 or mixed? >> Andy >> >> > I believe I have 1.4.2_09 JRE but 1.5 could have been SDK - let me check. > > Cheers/2 > > Ed. >> >> [G:\]java -version java version "1.4.2_09" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_09-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_09-b05, mixed mode) jre1.5.0_07 for 1.5 - so it looks like both are runtime environments, not the SDK. are you using JRE or SDK ? Cheers/2 Ed.