From: "Andy Willis" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2343044 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:15:53 -0500 Received: from static-71-171-102-26.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([71.171.102.26] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1Le0VK-00048q-V1 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:15:53 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.235]:44849) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Le0V9-0001kh-3C for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:15:40 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so2462357rvb.27 for ; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:15:38 -0800 (PST) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010204.49AB6B7C.002C,ss=1,fgs=0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U7y2hGn5ev1v2xAosHsGHm6BivPVN8xF1AcmPCnwDfg=; b=JsAOXA63wL4yeMDMGw8jrjwRBjq5gQNrl87tqyD16Z+1mnmlU3wQ03ksbvO0oJ0ske mF9C2H4zJpwwJjr+jyanSI/Q2y9Yk4Ofhj5nrKfpeFqeDut0UKHzFC9K4PxSf2hbxUCF 9POvFNpv7qhS/huut/Pft7fXp8uDCOopc+Uv4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nbGikBRY7VlVon1kx1jJwa8cq3cuQVIVO3kfeqXlB+yU59OCfx3GiucCJjmnUAFhka NJ2d/+aFLA1p8TWlMYbCiD+feC66oVbCb5fU0vTQuAaerl6RRhGm1m+0rSJVn9DxabAx VfQ4ePznvdflutXzMg3NS0HXtiM23DtRLz3d4= Received: by 10.141.146.4 with SMTP id y4mr2728325rvn.88.1235970557482; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:09:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.3? (71-208-199-14.hlrn.qwest.net [71.208.199.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f42sm213200rvb.3.2009.03.01.21.09.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:09:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49AB69FB.8070500@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:09:15 -0700 Reply-To: abwillis1@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090216 SeaMonkey/2.0a3pre not(Firefox/3.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: (OT:): JAVA SIP CLIENT References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: 1.0 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name 1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST RBL: Envelope sender in postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org Ed Durrant wrote: > Andy Willis wrote: >> Ed Durrant wrote: >>> Ed Durrant wrote: >>>> Andy Willis wrote: >>>> >>>>> Anyhow, I got to thinking Ed. Did you download the 1.4.2_09 or do >>>>> you have 1.4.2_05? I haven't tried the latter with 1.5. >>>>> Also did you get the JRE or SDK version of 1.4.2 and did you get >>>>> the matching 1.5? e.g. sdk 1.4.2 ad 1.5 or jre 1.4.2 and 1.5 or >>>>> mixed? >>>>> Andy >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I believe I have 1.4.2_09 JRE but 1.5 could have been SDK - let me >>>> check. >>>> >>>> Cheers/2 >>>> >>>> Ed. >>>>> >>>>> >>> [G:\]java -version >>> java version "1.4.2_09" >>> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_09-b05) >>> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_09-b05, mixed mode) >>> >>> jre1.5.0_07 for 1.5 - so it looks like both are runtime >>> environments, not the SDK. >>> >>> are you using JRE or SDK ? >>> >>> Cheers/2 >>> >>> Ed. >>> >> I actually have tested both successfully with SIP. I have the SDK >> for 1.4.2 and it seemed I had to pay special attention to the >> differences in location of files when I setup the 1.5 JRE but I got >> it going. As the SDK has more to it, I am not sure how successful it >> would be to feed the 1.5 SDK from the 1.4 JRE though (come to think >> of it, it would probably work for this... I actually have built with >> the 1.5 SDK which wouldn't work feeding from the jre). That error >> you got may just have been a bad version... I don't see 1731 as >> available, though whether it was pulled or if it cycled off I don't >> know. Currently I have 1752 running along. >> Andy >> >> / downloaded v 1735 and it exhibited exactly the same issues as 1731, >> so I don't think it's a SIP_Commander version thing, rather my set-up./ > > So your "base" is 1.4.2 SDK, not JRE ? and then you have transferred > all exe files from its BIN directory to the 1.5jre one ? - can you do > a quick dir of the exe files in the 1.4.2 SDK bin directory and I'll > compare with what I have - perhaps there's another file in the 1.5jre > directory that needs to be replaced ? > > This is what I have > > 1.4.2 JRE exe files in BIN directory: > > The volume label in drive G is ECS20RC3. > The Volume Serial Number is 72B7:C5C1. > Directory of G:\programs\java142\bin > > j2cpl.exe java.exe javaw.exe keytool.exe > kinit.exe klist.exe ktab.exe orbd.exe > policytool.exe rmid.exe rmiregistry.exe servertool.exe > tnameserv.exe > 13 file(s) 983,506 bytes used > 2,048,323 K bytes free > > and in my 1.5 directory (some, if not all, have been already > overwritten with the ones from 1.4.2): > j2cpl.exe java.exe javacpl.exe javaw.exe > javaws.exe jucheck.exe jusched.exe keytool.exe > kinit.exe klist.exe ktab.exe orbd.exe > pack200.exe policytool.exe rmid.exe rmiregistry.exe > servertool.exe tnameserv.exe unpack200.exe > 19 file(s) 1,610,886 bytes used > 49,065,984 bytes free > > Cheers/2 > > Ed. Here are the executables in my jre15\bin directory (not all of them have counterparts in Java142): java.exe javacpl.exe javaw.exe javaws.exe jucheck.exe jusched.exe keytool.exe kinit.exe klist.exe ktab.exe orbd.exe pack200.exe policytool.exe rmid.exe rmiregistry.exe servertool.exe tnameserv.exe unpack200.exe