From: "Andy Willis" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2343123 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:05:04 -0500 Received: from static-71-171-102-26.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([71.171.102.26] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1Le2Cx-0005lR-7q for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:05:04 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.231]:65381) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Le2Cu-0002II-0s for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 02:04:56 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so2505919rvb.27 for ; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:04:55 -0800 (PST) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010205.49AB8518.01A5,ss=1,fgs=0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zFGT6gszHEb5gJwbiV8IVMwh5yDOefxCljqJsWR3b5U=; b=i6cHSkplxfY/F2cEanAK4/no+e5fTHxS4XxmXQ4BUJJMAkjtq3rx7A1SFzG/UMYGKD AN6WoKd4QCUbK9kr+MZX5wmn93gDxSXlfMUvWxEQGBPlFVDVtljUiRK6JuR/8eGBEufe bETkB9BOfOuSDCiOxDlb7AmYqM5G0YgfnN+Rs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nRg7ypDeMpvAXqO5xqpb9OYXvF//yeTsWWxvWd/eMd2rg80elJhAGc+inqP/85wCLZ zrPNCvqMVm0x9cNASW+ILDbdiWENu22CiXQLOb2zwgGNMjx2Djje2L4pfsPiAEn5WJ/1 4fUjpNFulnxUaSzVlPfL4DEEV7CoVodWFQYiw= Received: by 10.141.210.2 with SMTP id m2mr2786034rvq.26.1235977495015; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:04:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.3? (71-208-199-14.hlrn.qwest.net [71.208.199.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g22sm5260128rvb.0.2009.03.01.23.04.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:04:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49AB8514.40409@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:04:52 -0700 Reply-To: abwillis1@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090216 SeaMonkey/2.0a3pre not(Firefox/3.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: (OT:): JAVA SIP CLIENT References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: 1.0 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name 1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST RBL: Envelope sender in postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org Ed Durrant wrote: > Andy Willis wrote: >> Ed Durrant wrote: >>> Andy Willis wrote: >>>> Ed Durrant wrote: >>>>> Ed Durrant wrote: >>>>>> Andy Willis wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyhow, I got to thinking Ed. Did you download the 1.4.2_09 or >>>>>>> do you have 1.4.2_05? I haven't tried the latter with 1.5. >>>>>>> Also did you get the JRE or SDK version of 1.4.2 and did you get >>>>>>> the matching 1.5? e.g. sdk 1.4.2 ad 1.5 or jre 1.4.2 and 1.5 or >>>>>>> mixed? >>>>>>> Andy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I believe I have 1.4.2_09 JRE but 1.5 could have been SDK - let >>>>>> me check. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers/2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Ed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> [G:\]java -version >>>>> java version "1.4.2_09" >>>>> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_09-b05) >>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_09-b05, mixed mode) >>>>> >>>>> jre1.5.0_07 for 1.5 - so it looks like both are runtime >>>>> environments, not the SDK. >>>>> >>>>> are you using JRE or SDK ? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers/2 >>>>> >>>>> Ed. >>>>> >>>> I actually have tested both successfully with SIP. I have the SDK >>>> for 1.4.2 and it seemed I had to pay special attention to the >>>> differences in location of files when I setup the 1.5 JRE but I got >>>> it going. As the SDK has more to it, I am not sure how successful >>>> it would be to feed the 1.5 SDK from the 1.4 JRE though (come to >>>> think of it, it would probably work for this... I actually have >>>> built with the 1.5 SDK which wouldn't work feeding from the jre). >>>> That error you got may just have been a bad version... I don't see >>>> 1731 as available, though whether it was pulled or if it cycled off >>>> I don't know. Currently I have 1752 running along. >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> / downloaded v 1735 and it exhibited exactly the same issues as >>>> 1731, so I don't think it's a SIP_Commander version thing, rather >>>> my set-up./ >>> >>> So your "base" is 1.4.2 SDK, not JRE ? and then you have transferred >>> all exe files from its BIN directory to the 1.5jre one ? - can you >>> do a quick dir of the exe files in the 1.4.2 SDK bin directory and >>> I'll compare with what I have - perhaps there's another file in the >>> 1.5jre directory that needs to be replaced ? >>> >>> This is what I have >>> >>> 1.4.2 JRE exe files in BIN directory: >>> >>> The volume label in drive G is ECS20RC3. >>> The Volume Serial Number is 72B7:C5C1. >>> Directory of G:\programs\java142\bin >>> >>> j2cpl.exe java.exe javaw.exe keytool.exe >>> kinit.exe klist.exe ktab.exe orbd.exe >>> policytool.exe rmid.exe rmiregistry.exe servertool.exe >>> tnameserv.exe >>> 13 file(s) 983,506 bytes used >>> 2,048,323 K bytes free >>> >>> and in my 1.5 directory (some, if not all, have been already >>> overwritten with the ones from 1.4.2): >>> j2cpl.exe java.exe javacpl.exe javaw.exe >>> javaws.exe jucheck.exe jusched.exe keytool.exe >>> kinit.exe klist.exe ktab.exe orbd.exe >>> pack200.exe policytool.exe rmid.exe >>> rmiregistry.exe >>> servertool.exe tnameserv.exe unpack200.exe >>> 19 file(s) 1,610,886 bytes used >>> 49,065,984 bytes free >>> >>> Cheers/2 >>> >>> Ed. >> Here are the executables in my jre15\bin directory (not all of them >> have counterparts in Java142): >> java.exe javacpl.exe javaw.exe javaws.exe >> jucheck.exe jusched.exe keytool.exe kinit.exe >> klist.exe ktab.exe orbd.exe pack200.exe >> policytool.exe rmid.exe rmiregistry.exe >> servertool.exe >> tnameserv.exe unpack200.exe >> >> > well, one difference is that I have a j2cpl.exe in my Java 1.5 BIN > directory, that you don't so I moved that out and tried again but got > the same error. > > I wonder - did you replace ALL the exe files in the Java 1.5 BIN > directory with those from 1.4.2 - or just some ? > > Do your file sizes / dates in the Java 1.5 BIN directory match these > please ? > > 20/09/05 17:30 79,410 356 a--- java.exe > 3/05/06 2:26 45,171 124 a--- javacpl.exe > 20/09/05 17:30 79,413 357 a--- javaw.exe > 3/05/06 2:26 127,078 124 a--- javaws.exe > 3/05/06 2:26 237,679 124 a--- jucheck.exe > 3/05/06 2:26 36,975 124 a--- jusched.exe > 20/09/05 17:31 79,437 359 a--- keytool.exe > 20/09/05 17:31 79,431 357 a--- kinit.exe > 20/09/05 17:31 79,431 357 a--- klist.exe > 20/09/05 17:31 79,428 356 a--- ktab.exe > 20/09/05 17:31 79,453 356 a--- orbd.exe > 3/05/06 1:40 53,376 124 a--- pack200.exe > 20/09/05 17:31 79,446 362 a--- policytool.exe > 20/09/05 17:31 79,428 356 a--- rmid.exe > 20/09/05 17:31 79,447 363 a--- rmiregistry.exe > 20/09/05 17:31 79,471 362 a--- servertool.exe > 20/09/05 17:31 79,460 361 a--- tnameserv.exe > 3/05/06 1:39 127,101 124 a--- unpack200.exe > 18 file(s) 1,580,635 bytes used > 49,013,760 bytes free > > Cheers/2 > > Ed. It looks like I took 2 approaches... for the SDK I just copied all the exe files over but for the JRE I was selective. SDK: 9-20-05 17:31 79,444 81 appletviewer.exe 5-03-06 10:30 53,359 29 apt.exe 11-19-06 17:58 79,444 73 avpm.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,438 77 extcheck.exe 9-20-05 17:31 50,642 82 HtmlConverter.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,436 73 idlj.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,416 72 jar.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,443 78 jarsigner.exe 4-14-08 1:50 79,410 30 java.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,432 74 javac.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,440 76 javadoc.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,432 74 javah.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,428 74 javap.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,413 74 javaw.exe 5-03-06 10:30 53,370 34 jconsole.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,439 72 jdb.exe 5-03-06 10:30 53,355 29 jps.exe 5-03-06 10:30 53,361 31 jstat.exe 5-03-06 10:30 53,364 32 jstatd.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,437 76 keytool.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,431 74 kinit.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,431 74 klist.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,428 73 ktab.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,456 81 native2ascii.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,453 73 orbd.exe 5-03-06 10:30 53,376 33 pack200.exe 5-03-06 10:57 69,745 34 packager.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,446 79 policytool.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,422 73 rmic.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,428 73 rmid.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,447 80 rmiregistry.exe 9-20-05 17:31 79,444 78 serialver.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,471 79 servertool.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,460 78 tnameserv.exe 5-03-06 10:30 127,101 35 unpack200.exe JRE: 4-14-08 1:50 79,410 30 java.exe 5-03-06 10:56 45,171 33 javacpl.exe 9-20-05 17:30 79,413 78 javaw.exe 5-03-06 10:56 127,078 32 javaws.exe 5-03-06 10:56 237,679 33 jucheck.exe 5-03-06 10:56 36,975 33 jusched.exe 5-03-06 9:38 53,368 33 keytool.exe 5-03-06 9:39 53,364 31 kinit.exe 5-03-06 9:39 53,364 31 klist.exe 5-03-06 9:39 53,362 30 ktab.exe 5-03-06 10:08 53,383 30 orbd.exe 5-03-06 10:10 53,376 33 pack200.exe 5-03-06 9:38 53,374 36 policytool.exe 5-03-06 10:01 53,362 30 rmid.exe 5-03-06 10:01 53,374 37 rmiregistry.exe 5-03-06 10:09 53,395 36 servertool.exe 5-03-06 10:08 53,392 35 tnameserv.exe 5-03-06 10:09 127,101 35 unpack200.exe One thing you can do for a test... rename your Java 1.4.2 directory and rename the 1.5 directory to match what it was. Then run your script to setup the 1.4.2, this way you know all the registry settings are right. If this works then we may need to make changes to the registry. Andy