X-UIDL: 1489 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from mail.2rosenthals.com (localhost [127.0.0.1] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 20:38:12 -0400 Received: from mail1.no-ip.com (goodyear.vitalwerks.com [64.156.198.155] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 20:38:11 -0400 X-Envelope-To: Received: (qmail 5072 invoked by uid 89); 2 Sep 2003 00:37:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAIL03.toast.net) (206.244.185.10) by mail1.no-ip.com with SMTP; 2 Sep 2003 00:37:57 -0000 Received: from 2rosenthals.com (unverified [24.47.134.13]) by MAIL03.toast.net (Vircom SMTPRS 2.1.258) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2003 20:33:43 -0400 Message-ID: <3F53E66E.5070609@2rosenthals.com> Organization: Rosenthal & Rosenthal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.4; MultiZilla v1.5.0.0) Gecko/20030622 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3F4F99E1.50002@hyder.org> <3F50EEB1.4030505@2rosenthals.com> <3F53A326.8010907@hyder.org> In-Reply-To: <3F53A326.8010907@hyder.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 20:38:06 -0400 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Lewis G Rosenthal To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] NetGear MA311 X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com Some additional thoughts... Ray Hyder wrote: >>> I realize the IBM driver was designed to run on a ThinkPad but it >>> does recognize the MA311 and works okay as far as I can see. >> >> >> It's all a matter of chipsets... > > > It is a Prism 2.5 chipset. Sorry, I should have said "firmware." Obviously, it would be a Prism chipset, like the IBM. :-) >> There's no universal yardstick. You could try using a parabolic >> reflector to increase gain at either (or both) end(s) of the connection. > > > Lewis, that's true but parabolic antennas are really expensive I wasn't referring to a parabolic antenna, merely a reflector. You could make one yourself by cutting a coffee can (ain't this stuff fun?). For some nice ideas, check out http://osiris.urbanna.net/antenna_designs/projects/template. > and for less money I could simply dig a trench between the two > buildings and drop in a Cat 5 cable and run at 100 Mbps. It would be > less than half the price and 10 times the speed... Why not? Don't > need the speed for the application I have and I'm now fascinated > with WiFi... :-) I'm not looking to increase bandwidth (you'd need 802.11a or g, at this point), just try to make up the signal loss for you. >>> I have a 5db gain omni-directional antenna on order for the >>> MA311. Will that help? >> >> >> >> Probably. Also try adjusting the placement of the antenna/AP. It's >> amazing how even a few inches can improve transmission. Also, try >> adjusting the relative positions of the antennae at the AP (like TV >> rabbit ears). > > > I've done that so many times I'm worried about wearing out the antennae! Sounds like a reflector (or two) could be just what the doctor ordered! >>> Stability... With all of the above considered, the MA311 somehow >>> decides, after about an hour, that it is time to quit work and it >>> goes "unavailable". Nothing will bring it back short of a reboot. >>> Please! What am I missing here? >> >> >> >> Hehehe... Welcome to the brave new world of Wi-Fi power management (or >> mismanagement, as the case may be). It sounds like the card's power >> management functions are being enabled, and unfortunately, Wi-Fi cards >> of today's vintage(!) are notorious for being unpredictable when power >> management is enabled. As there are no standards for power management > > > > Lewis, it turns out not to be a power management problem. For some > reason the MA311 likes to receive data but when it has to transmit > data it falls into an unrecoverable coma... Hmmm... Jens may have hit on it with his mention of firmware. Sounds like a bug, then. > Lewis, thanks for your input! - ray > > No problem! Oh, and remember, dumb looks are always free around here, too. (They just don't translate well to typing!) -- Lewis --------------------------------------------------------------------- Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal : Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia : www.2rosenthals.com Novell Users International : www.whytheylie.com OS/2's new face is eComStation : www.ecomstation.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 00:20 hours and 19 seconds =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=