From: "Al Heath" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1595832 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:49:01 -0500 Received-SPF: pass (secmgr-ny.randr: domain of us.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.151 as permitted sender) client-ip=32.97.110.151; envelope-from=aheath@us.ibm.com; helo=e33.co.us.ibm.com; Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1JFxCt-0005KL-I0 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:48:57 -0500 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0IJmUJM013209 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:48:30 -0500 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m0IJmTtr107068 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:48:29 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m0IJmTES003273 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:48:29 -0700 Received: from d03nm122.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm122.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.148]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0IJmSp5003193 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:48:29 -0700 Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Logging network activity from VPC To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:48:23 -0600 Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM122/03/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2FP2HF300 | September 14, 2007) at 01/18/2008 12:48:28 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; Boundary="0__=09BBF947DFFFD2B08f9e8a93df938690918c09BBF947DFFFD2B0" Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ --0__=09BBF947DFFFD2B08f9e8a93df938690918c09BBF947DFFFD2B0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:56:45 -0500 (EST), Hakan wrote: >>Dave, >> >>I wsas hoping that the 'net traffic originated by the Win application >>running in VPC would then be "managed" by the host operating system, >iptrace should see it - provided you are not using virtual switch. I >know that does *not* work. For future reference, how does one configure the network on a VPC guest to not use the virtual switch? I guess I've always had \IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\SWITCH.OS2 Al H --0__=09BBF947DFFFD2B08f9e8a93df938690918c09BBF947DFFFD2B0 Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:56:45 -0500 (EST), Hakan wrote:

>>Dave,
>>
>>I wsas hoping that the 'net traffic originated by the Win application
>>running in VPC would then be "managed" by the host operating system,

>iptrace should see it - provided you are not using virtual switch. I
>know that does *not* work.

For future reference, how does one configure the network on a VPC guest to not use the virtual switch? I guess I've always had
\IBMCOM\PROTOCOL\SWITCH.OS2

Al H --0__=09BBF947DFFFD2B08f9e8a93df938690918c09BBF947DFFFD2B0--