X-UIDL: 964 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from mail.2rosenthals.com (localhost [127.0.0.1] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:08:45 -0500 Received: from mail1.no-ip.com (goodyear.vitalwerks.com [64.156.198.155] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:08:43 -0500 X-Envelope-To: Received: (qmail 32135 invoked by uid 89); 23 Aug 2003 05:08:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAIL03.toast.net) (206.244.185.10) by mail1.no-ip.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2003 05:08:36 -0000 Received: from 2rosenthals.com (unverified [24.47.134.13]) by MAIL03.toast.net (Vircom SMTPRS 2.1.258) with ESMTP id for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:04:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3F46F6D8.7070901@2rosenthals.com> Organization: Rosenthal & Rosenthal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.4; MultiZilla v1.5.0.0) Gecko/20030622 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200308221341_MC3-1-493A-4B9D@compuserve.com> In-Reply-To: <200308221341_MC3-1-493A-4B9D@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:08:44 EST5EDT4,M4.1,M10.5 X-OldDate: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:08:40 -0400 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Lewis G Rosenthal To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] Wireless nomenclature X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com Charles - Charles McCallister wrote: >Lewis, > >Well, it seems that I've learned the concept of bridge though let me get >this straight. Working backward, the AP is the transceiver, the router is >the IP connector (for lack of better terminology) and the bridge is the >DSL modem hardware? > So far, so good. The difference between a bridge and a router is that a router connects two separate ethernet networks of the same topology (that's redundant; it connects two _ethernet_ networks). A bridge, OTOH, connects two different topologies, thereby creating a "bridge" between them. For DSL, this typically (in the case of SDSL and ADSL) means connecting an ethernet network to an analog telephone connection (I know, I know... DSL means *digital* subscriber line...). > And when DSL is down, the bridge is capable of using >an analog modem for a dial-up connection? About right? > No. You'd need either a router configured to detect the dead link (dead link detection, as it is commonly called; fancy that?) and then re-route the connection to a second routed (WAN) port, which in this case, would not be ethernet, but rather serial, to which a modem would be connected (either externally, as in the Nexland ISB100, or internally). The other alternative would be something akin to Cisco's HSRP (hot start routing protocol) where two or more separate routers are configured to act as one logical unit. One router is designated as the primary, and the others fall behind, in suit. When a dead link is detected by the primary (or the primary fails), the secondary fires up an alternate route. As the units are configured to share a single logical IP address, the clients don't know the difference, as their default gateway address hasn't changed. > Also, what's a >switch? > An intelligent hub. A hub merely divides bandwidth equally among all connected devices. This is the way Wi-Fi access points work, too. It is analogous to a lawn hose splitter, where equal amounts of water flow through each outlet of the splitter. A switch, OTOH, manages bandwidth much more efficiently, by taking advantage of the packetization of data and rapidly switching on and off the different connections. This gives the appearance to the devices that each one has a dedicated connection with (practically) a full pump. Pretty slick. >BTW, I've now been able to connect my IBM UltraPort Camera II (USB) to the >TP and look forward to video conferencing. Is anyone doing this over their > wireless DSL connection yet? Any success? Pros and Cons? Gotchas? >Suggestions for hardware? > I've thought about getting an UltraPort camera, but I didn't think there were any OS/2 drivers available (there's a familiar song, huh?). -- Lewis --------------------------------------------------------------------- Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal : Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia : www.2rosenthals.com Novell Users International : www.whytheylie.com OS/2's new face is eComStation : www.ecomstation.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 1 days 15:00 hours and 29 seconds =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=