From: "Hakan" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1595940 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:41:12 -0500 Received-SPF: none (secmgr-ny.randr: 74.208.4.195 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of meddatainc.com) client-ip=74.208.4.195; envelope-from=agents@meddatainc.com; helo=mout.perfora.net; Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.195]) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFy14-00064u-N1 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:41:07 -0500 Received: from progstn (pool-70-20-217-42.phil.east.verizon.net [70.20.217.42]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKpCa-1JFy0h2Sv5-0008KN; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:40:21 -0500 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:39:05 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: "Hakan" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2382 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Logging network activity from VPC Message-Id: <0MKpCa-1JFy0h2Sv5-0008KN@mrelay.perfora.net> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+AS9gdV6cn/ByQCqg4PQouTzUjxLNZ6kpb1tP t/Curpzc5C0p+P7ZiUHnUeouNSBslvwZilBJ11nWIFobDXiXuV P0jnT7zuv/1zr9T3Kyh1g== X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: 0.9 MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID Message-Id for external message added locally Dave, I won't be able to try until early next week but if iptrace does /not/ see any traffic, and since this is a Win application in VPC, I should be able to log the activity using another Win program running simultaneously under VPC. Does anyone have any recommendation for such a program? Free, of course... On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:04:11 +0000 (GMT), Dave Saville wrote: >On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:56:45 -0500 (EST), Hakan wrote: > >>Dave, >> >>I wsas hoping that the 'net traffic originated by the Win application >>running in VPC would then be "managed" by the host operating system, >>i.e., eCS 1.2MR in my case, and that a program that logs all network >>card traffic would log also this traffic. Given that I would not do >>anything else on the 'net at the same time, I am hoping that it would >>be feasible to figure out what the Win application sends and receives. > >iptrace should see it - provided you are not using virtual switch. I >know that does *not* work. If using the NAT mode does not show up in >iptrace then *nothing* you run on the host will see anything. As I said >you will need a hub and a *nix box with snoop or similar on it. > >The reason you need a hub is that hubs send everything they get to all >ports. Normally a box only acts on packets with it's own address in. A >sniffer gets the NIC to pass everthing and that is how it sees the >packets from the other machine. A switch OTH makes "virtual circuits" >between it's ports because it "knows" what is connected to each. So a >box can not see anything not directed at it. This is why, with a hub, a >massive FTP between two boxes will kill performance for everything >else. With a switch you don't notice anything - because you never see >the FTP packets. > >HTH > >-- >Regards > >Dave Saville > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to >Send administrative queries to >To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: and reply to the confirmation email. >Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com > >This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC >P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- >electronic communications related to content >contained in these messages should be directed >to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >