From: "Ed Durrant" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2366971 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 04:21:34 -0400 Received: from static-71-171-102-26.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([71.171.102.26] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1LkDVL-0002Aw-J0 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 04:21:34 -0400 Received: from nschwmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com ([61.9.189.149]:27723) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LkDV8-0007a0-0q for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 04:21:18 -0400 Received: from nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.184.242.103]) by nschwmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20090319082051.LXGZ20836.nschwmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:20:51 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.2] (really [124.184.242.103]) by nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20090319082048.KFYR4984.nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com@[192.168.100.2]> for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:20:48 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010203.49C2007E.01B5,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-ID: <49C20061.3010202@durrant.mine.nu> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:20:49 +1100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (OS/2/20070731) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: Opinions on a possible bargain References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at nschwotgx02p.mx.bigpond.com from [124.184.242.103] using ID edward.durrant@bigpond.com at Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:20:48 +0000 X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150201.49C20060.007B,ss=1,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ Mark Henigan wrote: > Ed Durrant wrote: >> Ray Davison wrote: >> >>> Mark Henigan wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Cognicenti: >>>> >>>> Does anyone have an opinion about the usefulness of >>>> the "Linksys WRT150N-RM Refurbished Wireless-N Home >>>> Router" (Refurbished by Linksys / Cisco with a 90 >>>> Day Warranty) for the "Email Special" price of >>>> $29.99? This would be for use under OS/2 - eCS, of >>>> course. >>> >>> >>> I have had one for a couple weeks, but have not yet plugged it in. >>> I'll try to move it nearer the top of my list. >>> >>> Ray >>> >>> >> My experience has been that all Linksys devices are configurable via >> a web interface. Some are supplied with "automatic configuration >> software" for those less technical and that software is invariably >> windows only. >> >> Linksys is a good make. If that device were available in Australia at >> that price (or the equivalent in Aussie Dollars), I'd seriously >> consider replacing my Linksys WRT54G which has been running very well >> for about 6 years now ! > > Hello Ed: > > Unfortunately, I didn't see your post until the > price had returned to $39.99 because the seller > is located on the East Coast. Do you think it's > worth it at that price, as well? > > TIA, > > - Mark > > Mark Henigan Looking at one ad for it: http://estore.it-dreamz.net/linksyswrt150n-rmwirelessnremanufacturedrouter.aspx Although it says it's an "N" router (note warnings from other people "N" is not yet ratified so you may get compatibility problems) - they say transmission speed is only 54 Mb/s (i.e. G or A speed not 'N"). I hope this is just a typo. I guess part of the equation should be what shipping will cost. If shipping is expensive, it could be better to buy locally at a higher price. Do you already have a wireless router ? If not, then as long as the shipping isn't too much, this is still a good deal IMHO. If you already have a wireless router, unless you upgrade all of your current systems to "N" you wont get any advantage over a "G" or "A" router. Cheers/2 Ed.