Message-Id: <20041018224313-27210-8@molen>
In-Reply-To: <417427E1.5070807@clanganke.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:  Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:43:13 +0200 (CDT)
Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner <os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com>
Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com
From:  "Peter Verweij" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
To:  "os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: [OS2Wireless] Wireless LAN Monitor vs wired/wireless cmd files

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:30:25 +0200, Christian Langanke wrote:

>does that make sense ? Any other ideas ?


Hi,

All three scenario's make sense.
I have a fourth one here at home:
lan0 (wirelessnic, sometimes dhcp, sometimes 192.168.1.18 )
lan1 (wired nic, normally not used, 192.168.2.19, but for backup at the weekend used and thus 192.168.1.19)
For backup at the weekend I have to chose the lan0 as 192.168.2.18 (wxlan widget)
but before that I have to disable lan1, after choosing wxlan to 192.168.2.18 I can change lan1 to 192.168.1.19 .
So I can start my backup of the notebook. 
Normally wireless has speed enough, but to backup 4 gig of data takes a long time. So wired 100Mb is then preferred.

greetings,

Peter


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body
(omit the quotes).

For help with other commands, send a message
to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"help" in the body (omit the quotes).

This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=