X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 29354 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from 192.168.100.5 (hawking [192.168.100.5]) by 2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20041018161328-53209-7 ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:13:28 -0400 (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20041018161327-39055-7 ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:13:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.170]) by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CJdsp-000JHs-E3 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:13:35 -0400 Received: from waldorf.webpack.hosteurope.de ([217.115.142.71]) by mx1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CJdsp-000HM1-3X for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:13:31 -0400 Received: from p5084a0d5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.132.160.213] helo=clanganke.de) by waldorf.webpack.hosteurope.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1CJdsa-0002Gi-T3 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:13:17 +0200 Message-ID: <417423E2.8030904@clanganke.de> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200410180031.i9I0VnU19605@ruby.fltg.net> In-Reply-To: <200410180031.i9I0VnU19605@ruby.fltg.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HE-MXrcvd: no X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS.org X-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:13:22 +0200 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Christian Langanke To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] Wireless LAN Monitor vs wired/wireless cmd files X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com Julian Thomas wrote: >In <4172F212.70503@clanganke.de>, on 10/18/04 > at 12:28 AM, Christian Langanke typed: > > > >>(1) if the wired interface and the wifi interface connect to the same >>network via DHCP, it is recommended that only one of either cable or >>wireless card may be available/active/plugged, _not both at once_. >> >> > >In other words we should stick to our scripts that disable the interface >about to be not used. > > > > Ah, I did not address one additional scenario with my previous posting: you definitely have the need to disable the previously used interface, if you intend reach the same IP subsegment once with cabled nic, then with wifi nic, without a system reboot. This is a case very similar to that you try to get an IP address by DHCP for your wireless nic, and receive an address of the same IP subsegment, as you configured manually and statically for your wired interface. As long as the two interfaces address different IP subsegments, there is no need for scripting. Se my other posting for soultions that I can think of to implement in XWLAN, so that hopefully scripting can be avoided also for these cases. bye, Christian ------------------------------------------------- Christian Langanke COS2E & CWSE Team OS/2 Ruhr e.V. cla@clanganke.de bye, Christian ------------------------------------------------- Christian Langanke COS2E & CWSE Team OS/2 Ruhr e.V. cla@clanganke.de =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=