X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 29260 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from 192.168.100.5 (hawking [192.168.100.5]) by 2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20041017235628-24169-7 ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:56:28 -0400 (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20041017235621-49036-7 ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:56:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.170]) by mxout1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CJOdE-0001AR-J8 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:56:27 -0400 Received: from mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.5.42]) by mx1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CJOdE-000Fo1-Gx for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:56:24 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.25] (ool-182f860d.dyn.optonline.net [24.47.134.13]) by mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I5R002BOHLZ18@mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:56:24 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <200410180031.i9I0VnU19605@ruby.fltg.net> Message-id: <41733EEB.4050507@2rosenthals.com> Organization: Rosenthal & Rosenthal MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8a4) Gecko/20040930 MultiZilla/1.6.4.0b Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 References: <200410180031.i9I0VnU19605@ruby.fltg.net> X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS.org X-Spam-Score: -4.7 (----) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:56:27 -0400 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Lewis G Rosenthal To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] Wireless LAN Monitor vs wired/wireless cmd files X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com That's the way I read it - and agree. At some point in the future, however, it would be nice to have the software make the decision as to switching to the connection with the greatest bandwidth (IBM Access Connections does this quite nicely). On 10/17/2004 08:26 pm, Julian Thomas thus wrote : >In <4172F212.70503@clanganke.de>, on 10/18/04 > at 12:28 AM, Christian Langanke typed: > > > >>(1) if the wired interface and the wifi interface connect to the same >>network via DHCP, it is recommended that only one of either cable or >>wireless card may be available/active/plugged, _not both at once_. >> >> > >In other words we should stick to our scripts that disable the interface >about to be not used. > > > > -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com ------------------------------------------------------------ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=