X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: 29182 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from 192.168.100.5 (hawking [192.168.100.5]) by 2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20041017004010-15810-7 ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:40:10 -0400 (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) id 20041017004009-7994-7 ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:40:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.170]) by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CJ2q2-000DrR-Ov for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:40:15 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39]) by mx1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CJ2q2-000LIf-L7 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 00:40:10 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.37] (c-24-9-118-46.client.comcast.net[24.9.118.46]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004101704395901500n0k58e> (Authid: abwillis@comcast.net); Sun, 17 Oct 2004 04:39:59 +0000 Message-ID: <4171F79D.8080108@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041012 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4171E1B8.5070306@2rosenthals.com> In-Reply-To: <4171E1B8.5070306@2rosenthals.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS.org X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 22:39:57 -0600 Sender: os2-wireless_users-owner X-Listname: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com From: Andy Willis To: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: [OS2Wireless] Wireless LAN Monitor vs wired/wireless cmd files X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to mailusers-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: mailusers-owner@2rosenthals.com Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > In my further test setups for class next week, I've been playing with > wired/wireless configurations. What I've found is that by using > Christian's utility, it isn't really necessary to use scripts for > bringing down the wired interface. Interestingly, the wired NIC comes > up first using DHCP, and then XWLAN brings up the WiFi card and > enables DHCP for that. Both interfaces remain active. I haven't yet > actually tested the individual connections (I was testing while > docked, and never actually pulled the cable from the dock), but this > seems infinitely easier than fussing with different scripts to bring > the interfaces down and up. > > Any thoughts along these lines? > One thing I have seen is that using wxlan I do not have loopback. IOW, if the wired card is in the system then I can ping localhost but if the wired card is not in and I have the wireless card in the system and use wxlan to set it up I cannot ping localhost. If I setup the wireless card using mpts (such that the wireless card replaces the wired card) I then have loopback (can ping localhost). I haven't ever played with any of the scripts so I don't know if it works that way or not. Both my cards are pcmcia and only one is in at a time. When using wxlan both are in mpts with the primary setup being the wired card and tcpip being established for the wireless card by wxlan. Have anyone else seen this? If so, is there a way to get it to work with the wireless card when using wxlan? Andy -- Warpstock 2004, Denver, Colorado, October 21 - 24, 2004 http://www.warpstock.org Volunteers: please send note to wsv2004@comcast.net =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=