From: "Andy Willis" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2377552 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:10:17 -0400 Received: from static-71-171-102-26.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([71.171.102.26] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1LnHRS-0001Gg-Sm for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:10:16 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.236]:46706) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LnHRL-00031O-1n for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:10:04 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1550749rvf.27 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:09:42 -0700 (PDT) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010203.49CD248C.0024,ss=1,fgs=0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=n7KYSL9crSo7OLN6C3ihEC2VhPNlIxckC336PjEp9OA=; b=PqRm/sbi+3bIaiOZVY8T/9fEjQBCvZt1mXCriLQgJz5dKHd8zMMDmPRbjcyQddyJCS bQJTjbaKZ3WoUCdMAJZkFcDVXVoox2w3l5RN9nPG7vCPtm3YFO8W5M0t41ZzIlXHalQC cpHCzi/70+mQQ/GqlSMm5WP+flTMk3xD27kLs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nDwN/1UuYxL4GRFy9Z1QBe88MVnvp2ekVI/Rm9Br5fZlI0xNNXv1X/fntdSNoo1mHr TieAb52LSzS1f2TUnRAOXZtVlVrOrAZpUGvD7ctTAwbDE2j69ScHfVmF8yEVdQP+V9QJ nLvuAMvKdGp86FOiy3nINJyct56GBD2fHCbv8= Received: by 10.141.198.2 with SMTP id a2mr1237462rvq.58.1238180982393; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.3? (71-208-192-212.hlrn.qwest.net [71.208.192.212]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g31sm4262445rvb.57.2009.03.27.12.09.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <49CD2474.7040101@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:09:40 -0600 Reply-To: abwillis1@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090216 SeaMonkey/2.0a3pre not(Firefox/3.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: OT: Netstat References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: 1.0 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name Well, I was curious what is said and now I am curious why I can't find it. Here is a little on it that sounds right: Andy Sam Lewis wrote: > Andy, > Probably because it is becoming a more common sight and loopback > interfaces are required for so many things now that they are always > enabled. > > Didn't mean to make you do any work. > Thanks, > Sam > > Andy Willis wrote: > >> Interesting, I went to check exactly what it said but it no longer >> shows in the readme. Used to say something about it being required >> but nothing about it now. >> Andy >> Sam Lewis wrote: >> >>> Ah, the good ol readme. Glad somebody reads them :). >>> >>> It seems odd that programs talk to themselves locally by way of >>> network sockets. But then again I'm not a programmer. I saw this >>> behavior while working on my daughter's Vista laptop and thought it >>> was odd as well but I guess its a normal thing. >>> Andy thanks, >>> Sam >>> >>> Andy Willis wrote: >>> >>>> Sam Lewis wrote: >>>> >>>>> I was looking at the netstat -s output for my laptop and found >>>>> these ports talking to each other >>>>> SOCK TYPE FOREIGN LOCAL >>>>> FOREIGN STATE >>>>> PORT PORT HOST >>>>> ====== ===== ========== ========== ========== >>>>> ======== >>>>> This appears to be from Mozilla 1.7.7 >>>>> 24 STREAM 54811 54812 127.0.0.1 ESTABLISH >>>>> 25 STREAM 54812 54811 127.0.0.1 ESTABLISH >>>>> >>>>> This is from Firefox 2.x >>>>> 1074 STREAM 55115 55116 127.0.0.1 >>>>> ESTABLISH >>>>> 1075 STREAM 55116 55115 127.0.0.1 >>>>> ESTABLISH >>>>> 1080 STREAM 55117 55118 127.0.0.1 >>>>> ESTABLISH >>>>> 1081 STREAM 55118 55117 127.0.0.1 >>>>> ESTABLISH >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why are these applications establishing streams between themselves? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Sam >>>>> >>>> I am not sure of the reason why... I just know that it is by >>>> design. That is why the readme says to make sure that the loopback >>>> is enabled. >>>> Andy