From: "Ed Durrant" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2400130 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:32:54 -0400 Received: from static-71-171-102-26.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([71.171.102.26] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1LsQDK-0006UU-R1 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:32:53 -0400 Received: from nskntqsrv03p.mx.bigpond.com ([61.9.168.237]:58295) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsQDE-0004fD-0n for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:32:44 -0400 Received: from nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.184.157.45]) by nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20090410202805.SGRJ8076.nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:28:05 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.2] (really [124.184.157.45]) by nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20090410202804.RIVR18710.nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com@[192.168.100.2]> for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:28:04 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010206.49DFD71C.009D,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-ID: <49DFABD3.2030806@durrant.mine.nu> Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:28:03 +1000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (OS/2/20070731) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Re: ftp network References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at nskntotgx01p.mx.bigpond.com from [124.184.157.45] using ID edward.durrant@bigpond.com at Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:28:04 +0000 X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150202.49DFABD4.008A,ss=1,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ os24u wrote: > ** Reply to note from "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:07:05 -0400 > >> >> Although the device you are connected to is a router, what you are actually using is the built in n-way switch. I presume the subnet >> mask in use is 255.255.255.0 ? If so all three addresses are on the same network subnet and you don't need to set any routes on >> the systems, the two PCs should "see" each other. Perhaps if you are executing a route command this is causing the problem ? >> >> > > This is my network start file. Internet out is fine. Ftp is fine as long as server is running. Stop server and restart later, error message > from client: can not find the ip address. Since I always had to reboot when trying ftpserver again, tried resetting the routes by: > > route flush and then run setup.cmd. Am not familiar with networks and tcpip to know if this is normal but one would think not. Should > not be the router either as you say it is just a switch. > > **setup.cmd** > ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 > ifconfig lan0 192.168.1.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 metric 1 mtu 1492 > route add default 192.168.1.1 > route add -net 192.168.0.1 192.168.1.1 -netmask 255.255.255.0 -hopcount 1 > ipgate off > > Also find file below on boot but appears to be for peer network which is not installed. > > tcpcoex.log > Log file for TCPCOEX.EXE ..... run time: Fri Apr 10 08:24:44 2009 > > FINDOURDIRS: nfsctl.exe not found! > TCPDIR(s):D:\TCPIP > END TCPCOEX.EXE > > Main question on this is: is it normal to have to run setup.cmd to re-establish the route through router? > > Cal > > > The setup.cmd file looks fine. I have no idea what TCPCOEX is and whether it may be causing the problems - it appears to be trying to start NFS (which is not peer networking, rather a Unix style network drive mounting capability) - it is reporting an error, I would try to stop this from trying to run. The other file that may be relevant is tcpstart.cmd - can you post that here please ? Cheers/2 Ed. > >