????????? #4941 ?????? ?????? ???????? os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com

??: Sam Lewis <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> ?????? ?????????
?????????????? ?????????
???????????: os2-wireless_users-owner <os2-wireless_users-owner@2rosenthals.com>
????: [OS2Wireless] 128 bit WEP
????: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:19:54 -0500
????: os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com



Peter Verweij wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 20:29:11 -0500, Sam Lewis wrote:
>
> >If I configure the NIC only in MPTS / Protocol.ini with the encryption key I can't get on the network at all.  But if I do the same thing with an AP that is
> >an open system it connects to the network just fine.  Is that a bug?  Or is Wifistate supposed to be a requirement?
>
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand what you mean.(first sentence)

What I meant was I configured the WEP Key and SSID through MPTS which configures the protocol.ini and I didn't start the WiFiState utility.  It didn't connect to
the network.

But I do the same with an open system it connects to the network automatically just fine.

I'm getting different behaviours on a encrypted network and open network.  And was wondering if there was a reason for it.

>
> Are you sure you enabled the wep key if you put it in mpts? under authentication type you have tx key number where you should give the number where
> you stored your wep key (normally 1)

Yes I believe I did that correctly.

>
> Wifistate isn't required I used the Artem driver and a release candidate without wifistat and wep enabled.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Peter
>

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"unsubscribe os2-wireless_users" in the body
(omit the quotes).

For help with other commands, send a message
to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command
"help" in the body (omit the quotes).

This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=




???????????: ?????????, ????????, ?????????.
??????????
???????? ?????????????? ?????? ????????